Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

Author: mascara

Nigel Featherstone

Nigel Featherstone is a queer writer for the page, stage, and music. His most recent major work is The Story of the Oars, a play with spoken songs, which had its world premiere at The Street Theatre, Canberra, in 2025. Nigel’s novels include Bodies of Men (Hachette) was longlisted for the ARA Historical Novel Prize, runner-up for the ACT Book of the Year, and shortlisted in the Queensland Literary Awards. Recently he has been shortlisted for the ACU Prize for Poetry and the Newcastle Poetry Prize. Nigel is also the founder of Hell Herons, a spokenword+music collective that released its debut album, The Wreck Event, in 2024 (with Melinda Smith, Stuart Barnes, and CJ Bowerbird). In 2014 he was commissioned to write the libretto for a highly regarded song cycle, The Weight of Light, which had its world premiere at The Street Theatre in 2018. His short works – prose and poetry – have appeared in Guardian Australia, Sydney Morning Herald, Meanjin, Lantana, Griffith Review, Oystercatcher, Rabbit, Locative, Kill Your Darlings, The Millions, ANARKISS (UK), Horseshoe Literary Magazine (Canada), Chicago Quarterly Review, and AC | DC: Journal for the Bent (USA), among other outlets. A former ACT Artist of the Year, Nigel lives with Gandangara, Ngunnawal and Ngambri Country (regional NSW and ACT).

 

 

Continue reading

Angela Costi

Angela Costi’s poetry collections include Honey & Salt, An Embroidery of Old Maps and New, and The Heart of the Advocate. Her chapbook, Adversarial Practice, published by Cordite was commended in the Wesley Michel Wright Prize 2024. She won the University of Canberra’s Health Poetry Prize 2024 and the Katherine Sussanah Prichard (KSP) Poetry Prize 2022. She is currently working on a poetry collection titled A Body of Rocks, which unravels genetic medical conditions and their intersections with inherited ancestral trauma.

 


I Don’t Want to Step on Anyone’s Ancestral Toes But

a genetic impasse
T    my nonbinary eighteen-year-old
shows their Ancestry.com report
They welcome my body’s people
48% from Cyprus    

I wasn’t even born there
yet 96% of me is engulfed
by a small bisected    tired concubine of empires    forced to lie
between Turks and Greeks    to snap into exotic dance
for the British and American colonels 

I am the first generation to be settled
to read in English    an official report by the District General
of the state of Cyprus    but my body is fired by dialect
by women with full-term wombs running from
military borders    they hide in the caves    to birth    

Somehow    I poured Cyprus
into T’s long fingers    red hair    voice made for singing The Long and Winding Road
Next   I’ve given T    2% refugee and military camps
of the Levant states    2% Arabian Peninsula
the greats and grands who survived with olives raining like bullets     

The DNA Report    splits T    further
like a shopping list of food for the freezer
Norway    Germanic Europe    Scotland    England
We count 9 tribes pillaging   squandering   settling
from their father’s DNA  

Not happy with the English in me    T says
as we sit on a Queen size bed
live in a street named Queen
in the State of Victoria
study Year 12 Drama    ensconced in Elizabethan etiquette 

England & Northwestern Europe share a mere 5% of their code
Sweden & Denmark dictate an entire 16%
still    they worry about those with smaller numbers
will they go warring for the better
parts in West Side Story

what percent wants the lead role
who is content to be in the ensemble
who doesn’t care whether they dress
as man or woman for any character
I don’t care    says T’s father   but  my 1% Italian  might   

 

Margaret Bradstock reviews Thistle by Kate Maxwell

Thistle

by Kate Maxwell

ISBN 9781764106870

Recent Works Press

 

Reviewed by MARGARET BRADSTOCK

Thistle, Kate Maxwell’s third poetry collection, is a book depicting the trajectory of a life, choosing, as its approach, a dipping in and out of time. The collection is dedicated to the poet’s dead mother, whose late-onset dementia is movingly recalled in the elegiac “The Forest and the Trees”:

     When she’s finally gone
                   not like this
                   not this
                   slow scrape of self
     pieces of the past
                                 falling
     like potato peelings
    around her slippered feet

     …………………………

     ever searching, ever trying
     to recall the question
                     she can’t answer
(pp. 7-8)

This poem is echoed in “Into the Forest” in the final section of the book:

     If you ever want to find my mother
                Follow the tissues:
                                those crumpled,
                   hardly damp, thin cotton clouds
     held to twitching lips,   

     ………………………………….

     Like an ancient Gretel,
                 she’s still leaving trails,
                   flagging out her one-way journey
                   into deeper woodlands
(p.100)

2.

and has its conclusion in the evocative “Believe”:
     I used to believe in clouds
     until the roar of a Boeing 737
     dissolved my Kinder innocence,
     back when I’d paint stick-figure
     me and stick-figure you
     floating in a bright blue sky.
     Yet, while reason reminds
     there is nothing above
    nothing to hold in the heavens,
     I believe – like ice crystals
     suspended in the atmosphere –
     you too, are somewhere
(pp.102-3)

“The Forest and the Trees”, and “Kaleidoscope”, both appearing in the opening section of the collection, serve to trigger childhood memories, beginning with “Beyond” – the poet’s recollections of a small country town and her yearning for the extraterrestrial:

     I would lie: palms cradling neck,
     listening to chirp and croak,

                        drinking in jewelled black,
                       brighter than neon, higher than the highest
                        high-rise, more distant than a million strangers.
(p.4)
                     

The book’s title, Thistle, and the back-cover statement “Life doesn’t always bloom the way you expect. Sometimes it prickles,” suggest that a number of the poems will deal with life’s disappointments and irritations. These poems, many of which appear in the second section, are a delight – humorous, perspicacious and cutting-edge, providing social comment. In “Waiting in the Queue” Maxwell presents us with the graceless male ahead of her, who

                   flicks his card
  over the machine
  without a word
             to the smiling waitress
               or busy barista                               

then clutching coffee
almost collides into a pram

               3.

               as he wades through
               humans in his way.
(pp.48-9) 

In “Colossus” she takes aim at those unnamed “who could hope to govern the globe”, as: 

A set of opposable thumbs does not grant me dominion.

    Primates, possums, birds – even some frogs
        could hold cutlery, if so inclined.                      

 …………………………………………………..

       yet still we wail at the height of the moon.

How dare it be higher or brighter than us!
   the billionaires cry, punching holes into space
      just to show the damn universe who’s the real boss.
(pp. 57-58)

 “Basking” is another such poem, where the unnamed protagonist is immediately and amusingly identifiable:

The mogul’s getting hitched again
at ninety-three. He can’t seem to make one last
past his plans for an afternoon nap
and world domination.

…………………………

         an empire so layered
         in flashy fabrications
        that he cannot place
                 where he left his last wife
                      or whether he had one at all.

…………………………..

Each crevice sprawled across his chin
a final line in the sand
           for each bride
           who wasn’t what he ordered.
(pp.62-3)

The third and final section of Kate Maxwell’s book, including the already discussed “Into the Forest” and “Believe”, encapsulates a time of looking back and reflection. The beautiful opening poem, “I Cannot Build a Shelter”, engenders a sense of determination to make the best of a flawed and often disappointing world:                        

4.

from hollow sticks in the grass
             snapped with cold fingers   broken
                          with boot   crunched by the claws
                                      of brush turkey feet   hurled skyward

in storm   and too damp to burn
             too fickle   too thin to build shield
                           from the wind   that might thatch
                                         a tense weave   against chill of the night.
(p.77)

 

But I will build shelter within these small
             words   a home for my yearning layered
                          in script   sealed in dry ink   patched
                                       with hubris and hope   wrapping heart

with the wishes of how it could be
(p.78)

However, humour is not lacking in this deeper, more introspective section, and there is still room for irony and wit at the expense of some of the challenges of modern living. Proof of identity, or even of being human, is one of the more annoying of these, as in the poem “Prove Humanity”:

Check a box
to prove you’re not a box
of whirring parts
wired circuits or stuff
you just don’t understand
then when the box

learns to recognise
our patterns, ways

………………….

then they’ll have to
set the sentient
new challenges −
(p.82)     

 

Subject matter of the poems in Thistle ranges through personal, political and environmental to keenly observational, and Maxwell is not afraid to reveal heartfelt emotion, or satirise some of the absurdities of the human condition. Experimentation with poetic form and astute wordplay add to the mix, ensuring a multi-faceted perspective. Readers will find much to enjoy in this collection, the more poignant poems continuing to reverberate long after a first reading.

 

MARGARET BRADSTOCK is a Sydney poet, critic and editor, lectured at UNSW for 25 years, has been Asialink Writer-in-residence at Beijing University, co-editor of Five Bells for Poets Union, and on the Board of Directors for Australian Poetry. Poetry collections include The Pomelo Tree (winner of the Wesley Michel Wright Prize) and Barnacle Rock (winner of the Woollahra Festival Award, 2014). Editor of Antipodes, the first Australian anthology of Aboriginal and white responses to “settlement” (2011) and Caring for Country (2017), Margaret won the Banjo Paterson Poetry Award in 2014, 2015 and 2017. Alchemy of the Sun (Puncher & Wattmann, 2024) is her ninth collection. 

 

  

Duc Dau

Duc Dau is an award-winning author, scholar, and emerging poet from Boorloo (Perth). She is the most recent recipient of the Jan Dean Members Prize of the Newcastle Poetry Prize as well as the Annette Cameron Award for an unpublished poet in Western Australia. “The Sign” was shortlisted/commended in the 2025 Tom Collins Poetry Prize. An Honorary Research Fellow in the School of Humanities at the University of Western Australia, her latest academic book is Sex, Celibacy, and Deviance: The Victorians and the Song of Songs (Ohio State University Press, 2024). She also works in the research and evaluation team of an Aboriginal community-controlled organisation.

 

The sign

The holiday prematurely ended
sex toys still in our luggage

heading home along a slope of road
and a yellow sign says “soft shoulders”

outside us the rain turning to hail
hitting the gravel with exclamation marks

we stop
—waiting for the thundering to pass

you in the car beside me, shoulders stiff-
ening like weathervanes against the wind

our breathing fogging up the windows
blinding us. I run a hand across the passenger pane

look out at the bush, newly backburned
—blackened, its naked stumps becoming

jumbled limbs miming
precautionary signs on the way home.

Sreepurna Datta reviews Gather Up Your World In One Long Breath by S. Shakthidharan

Gather Up Your World in One Long Breath

by S. Shakthidharan

Powerhouse

ISBN: 9780645530964

Reviewed by SREEPURNA DATTA


Gather Up Your World in One Long Breath
is a sincere attempt to deliver what its title promises. “Tell me all the stories from your life, from the beginning to the end,” asks the author’s son in the opening section of S. Shakthidharan’s memoir. The following chapters provide a range of moving and unique stories from the author’s life. Shakthi’s play Counting and Cracking – which won the Victorian Prize for Literature, the Nick Enright Prize for Playwriting, and several other awards – was also based on the playwright’s personal history. Gather Up Your World in One Long Breath not only fleshes out this history further but also explores how it shapes the author’s present. 

In a radio interview, Shakthi explains his approach towards telling the “stories from [his] life” through this memoir. Surrounded by his family on a busy morning of his life, he found himself wondering “why the hell [he] was feeling such joy in a time of madness and difficulty” (Knight). Here, Shakthi follows up by providing a brief answer: “It was because…this was the first time that I had been inside a family.” The memoir gears up to explore both how the author found his family, as well as what broke his family apart in the first place. 

Gather Up Your World in One Long Breath is thus, at one level, quite a personal endeavour. The book is structured as a series of second-person narratives. Each section is addressed to one of the most important people in the author’s life, including his parents and his partner. Quickly and spontaneously, however, the personal expands into a lens to the broader histories that shape the author’s life. This is conveyed to the reader in advance through the eye-catching paratext. The book design and endpaper illustrations are credited to Tamil artists – from both India and Sri Lanka. The sections of the book are divided with pulli kolam – dotted geometrical patterns traditionally painted on the floor, especially doorways, for prosperity. The endpaper artwork includes oceanic motifs, further drawing attention to the author’s diasporic background. The memoir is crucially shaped by this transoceanic history, and the focus on family is refracted into a broader sense of belonging in terms of culture and nation.  

The memoir’s central character is, by definition, the author, but Shakthi’s narrative partly subverts this formal requirement by centering a physical object: the author’s uniquely mobile family home. In a chapter addressed to the house itself, we find the chronological beginning of the story: Shakthi’s great grandparents were of Tamil ethnicity, living in Sri Lanka in the mid twentieth century. This was the period over which the teardrop-shaped island gained independence from British colonisation and gradually became the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka. Shakthi’s family was directly part of this political history: his great-grandfather was Chellapah Suntharalingam, who was the Minister of Trade and Commerce in Sri Lanka for a year, and a member of the parliament for more than a decade. Shakthi was born into a large family living in a single house and integrally linked to the heterogenous community around it. However, anti-Tamil riots in the 1980s eventually led to the scattering of this family and community to different lands. Shakthi’s most immediate family moved to Australia, where his grandmother rebuilt her Sri Lankan house – literally having parts of the house shipped across oceans and then put back together. Shakthi writes: “Each day, you still face the rising sun and feel it set behind you. But where you used to absorb a South Asian monsoon, you now sweat out a Sydney summer” (44-5). Every individual addressed in this memoir has been – in one way or another – linked to this house which Shakthi grew up in, returned to as an adult, and still resides in.

Home is a recurrent preoccupation – perhaps the central one – in diasporic narratives. Protagonists in these stories leave their homes and seek to make new ones in foreign soil. The process is never smooth. In Shakthi’s memoir, the image of the house being broken into pieces and put back together acts as a representation of the figurative journey of the author seeking to make a new home. The memoir underlines that while it might seem like the house “evaporated into the Sri Lankan sky and fell back down as a Sydney shower,” in reality it went through a painful fracture (39). The reassembled version of the house only partly resembles the original, and the author’s connection to the house is now far more troubling and even at times oppressive: “You are our only connection to who we once were. And you will not let me go” (53). The author’s connection to family and community undergoes to same process. Poet and playwright Derek Walcott, describing the performance of Indian epics by village actors in the Antilles, wrote: “Break a vase, and the love that reassembles the fragments is stronger than that love which took its symmetry for granted when it was whole… Antillean art is this restoration of our shattered histories, our shards of vocabulary, our archipelago becoming a synonym for pieces broken off from the original continent.” In Shakthi’s memoir the house – and in parallel, the family – resembles this vase and the archipelago, representing a love that is stronger because it reassembles the fragmented. 

The image of the archipelago has further resonance. Postcolonial and decolonial scholars have championed “archipelagic thought” (in the Western world, proposed by Édouard Glissant), a philosophy of thinking of the world as an archipelago, a rhizomatic concept without centres – or mainlands – and peripheries. Gather Up Your World in One Long Breath presents the world in this rhizomatic sense. For instance, the memoir does not exceptionalise Australia but portrays it as one in a series of islands, including Sri Lanka and Malta, where Shakthi’s partner hails from, that make up the story of Shakthi’s family. Soon after moving to Australia, Shakthi’s parents were divorced, after which he grew up primarily with his mother, Anandavalli, a Bharatnatyam dancer by profession. With retrospective knowledge and understanding, Shakthi imagines his mother’s initial fear of losing his son to Australia: “In Sri Lanka we had a community…Here, I am alone. And I am terrified I am going to lose you, too” (104-5; italics in original). However, gradually developing a more symbiotic relationship with the land, Anandavalli contributed to building a diverse community of artists in 1990s Sydney with the help of “Aboriginal men and European women” (78-9). The point is crystallised in Shakthi’s description of this community-building: “What a way to become Australian! To belong! Not by limiting yourself, but by expanding the collective sense of what we might all become, what our country might one day be” (79). To become Australian is to join its identity to other islands, to make it part of the archipelago. The author’s own career reflects the same: Shakthi is the founder of an arts company, whichais focused on “fostering… relationships between [South Asian] communities and Australia’s major creative institutions” (Kurinji). 

A rhizomatic imaginary also pervades the author’s descriptions of family and home. The section addressed to the author’s father describes him as someone who, after leading a strikingly lonely life after his divorce and estrangement from his family, finds “strange and unexpected” community in the final years of his life (232). Here, the concept of family not only expands beyond blood relations but also challenges the established hierarchies in father-son relationships. In the middle section of the book addressed to the author’s partner, the couple have a conversation that extends the idea of expansion to the central image of the home. When his partner asks Shakthi to consider that she does not necessarily want to live in Shakthi’s family home her whole life, it leads the couple to rethink their ideas of home, to include something that “expands” rather than being fixed in a certain physical location (198). This is how the memoir connects nation, family, and home: all three must be reassembled by “expanding the collective sense of what we might all become.” Perhaps the joy that the author finds is born’Here,  out of this openness towards expansion at different levels of his world.

While South Asian diasporic narratives are not quite front-and-centre in Australian literature today, Shakthi’s memoir – and his playwriting oeuvre – joins a gradually emerging set of South Asian voices in a variety of genres. When Shankari Chandran (who is also of Sri Lankan Tamil origin) won the 2023 Miles Franklin Literary Award, the novelist commented that her win “reflects the change that is happening in Australian literature, and that has been happening for many years now in terms of what the curators of culture and publishers are allowing through to be published” (Manley). Gather Up Your World in One Long Breath – the first literary publication of Sydney’s Powerhouse Museum – is an exciting reminder of this richly diverse future towards which Australian literary culture can potentially be headed. The memoir is a promising step towards the shaping of Australian literature as a restoration of shattered pieces, of a neighbourhood of houses carried over from other islands across the archipelago-world.


WORKS CITED

“Kurinji.” Kurinji, kurinji.com.au.

Glissant, Édouard. Introduction to a Poetics of Diversity. Translated by Celia Britton, Liverpool University Press, 2020. 

Knight, Dom. “Sri Lanka to Sydney Brick by Brick: S Shakthidharan.” ABC Listen, 19 Sept. 2025, www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/sydney-saturdaybreakfast/shakthi/105797384.

Manley, Janet. “Miles Franklin Winner Shankari Chandran on Defining Australianness.” Literary Hub, 28 Aug. 2023, lithub.com/miles-franklin-winner-shankari-chandran-on-defining-australianness.

Walcott, Derek. “The Antilles: Fragments of Epic Memory.” 7 Dec. 1992, www.nobelprize.org/prizes/literature/1992/walcott/lecture.

 

SREEPURNA DATTA (she/her) is a PhD candidate at the University of Tasmania and currently based in Hobart. Her research examines the emergence of South Asian diasporic romance novels in contemporary book culture, with a focus on the ideological and material transactions that contribute to the transnationality of the popular romance genre.

Isabel Howard reviews Cannon by Lee Lai

Cannon

Lee Lai

Giramondo

ISBN 9781923106406

Reviewed by ISABEL HOWARD
 

The first thing I noticed when I received Lee Lai’s Cannon, slipping it out of its envelope in my quiet living room, was how heavy it was. A large, squarish slab, I imagined it could cause some serious damage if it landed on my toes. Or squish a large cockroach, if I had nothing else at hand. 

Sitting on the couch, I was around twenty pages in when I noticed something strange. There was a weight resting in my body, not unlike the book itself: dense, ungainly, with hard edges that feel awkward in a human hand. It made me want to curve my body inward, or hold my breath, like I was preparing myself for some kind of onslaught. So, I closed the book. I got up and did things I’m supposed to do. Empty the dishwasher. Fold the laundry. As I moved around, the feeling shrank. But it didn’t disappear. 

The life of the titular character, Cannon (known by her family as Lucy) is the focus of Lai’s graphic novel. In the very first scene, before we even reach the title page, she stands in a restaurant, surrounded by broken furniture, shattered crockery and spilled condiments. She’s struck with panic as she takes in the scene, but before abandoning it, she smashes one last plate. 

Rewinding to three months earlier, the novel starts again with a portrait of Cannon’s day-to-day. She’s a Chinese-Canadian, queer young woman who takes care of her ageing gung-gung (grandfather) and works as a chef. She watches horror films with her best friend, Trish, and she runs regularly to a podcast that tells her to ‘release tension’ and ‘breathe’. Her peers refer to her as ‘stoic’ and ‘reliable,’ and her expressions are flat and devoid of emotion, but as the story progresses, we learn that Cannon’s calmness is on a precipice. Magpies gather around her, which no one else can see. Her work goes unappreciated, her hurts go unacknowledged, and she begins having panic attacks as her composure falls away. When her friendship with Trish is about to breakdown and her boss makes a pass at her, she cannot take anymore. Her anger overflows, and she trashes the restaurant in a violent episode where the pages are flooded with red. Afterwards, she slowly begins to rebuild, having learned what pushed her over the edge. 

Lai’s graphic novel is preoccupied with responsibility and rage. Until Cannon’s breakdown, her efforts to be dutiful and unflappable are relentless. She cleans for her gung-gung while her mother ignores her texts. She cooks for Trish, who secretly uses Cannon for creative inspiration. She tries to keep the peace at work while avoiding her lecherous boss, and when her co-worker describes Cannon’s care for her gung-gung as ‘wholesome’, Cannon responds with ‘I just have to do it’. Despite the clear frustration in Cannon’s silences and facial expressions, she acts sensibly and responsibly, refusing to acknowledge pain, accept praise, or ask for help, even when her feet begin blistering, and her doctor asks, ‘my goodness, what have you been doing to yourself?’ But acting in accordance with what other people want and stymieing her own feelings are what build her anger to the point of violence. Trish pinpoints this right before Cannon breaks down in the restaurant:

‘It’s not my problem that you’ve sidelined all of your twenties to deal with other people’s shit. There’s no virtue in being so solitary and self-effacing and resentful, you know.’

Cannon asks questions about how we fulfil our obligations to our family and friends, how we address our own wellbeing, and whether we must sacrifice either. These questions are likely to show up in every life, but their significance in Cannon’s echoes what some describe as ‘the eldest daughter’ experience, where daughters, particularly those in Asian families, feel pressure to take on caretaking and emotional responsibilities from a young age (Chau, Vadakumchery). 

Upon reaching Trish’s words above, I realised these questions were also, in fact, the source of my own discomfort. Having grown up in an Asian immigrant family, these pressures are disturbingly familiar: should I prioritise my personal needs, or the needs of my loved ones? Should I express my own hurt, even if it risks destroying a relationship? Lai does not delve into an examination of how gender, race or sexuality may factor into these questions, but the uneasiness I felt shows just how effectively she brings them to life. 

Riding the wave of her anger, a slightly different Cannon emerges after the trashing of the restaurant. She tells Trish to delete the writing about her, breaks off a confusing relationship with her co-worker, and insists on a response from her mother. After over two-hundred pages of compliance, her confrontations are satisfying to watch, and in response, her friends and loved ones shift toward her rather than away: several coworkers cover up her wrecking of the restaurant, her mother starts engaging with her gung-gung, and Trish takes care of Cannon’s meals. This shift paints anger as a tool for catharsis and communicating one’s needs, rather than one for inflicting damage, or cutting people and responsibilities ‘out’. Even Trish’s response to hearing about the magpies, which have always appeared when Cannon feels overwhelmed, reiterates the idea of rage as helpful: ‘They’re probably just looking out for you.’ 

In a final scene, Cannon receives the news that her gung-gung has died in hospital. At this point, I wondered if his death would be framed as some kind of ‘freedom’ for Cannon: his care is potentially the most onerous of her responsibilities, which are already in quick decline. However, after hanging up the phone, she sits alone and cries, surrounded again by magpies. At the end of a novel that largely presents Cannon’s efforts as challenging and unappreciated, her grief complicates the idea that care becomes a burden when it is unreciprocated. 

I have not read many graphic novels, but Lai’s skill with the form is obvious even to me. The writing is almost exclusively dialogue, and her illustrations are deceptively simple: black and white, with minimal shading on soft, curved faces and bodies. Wordless panels, both close-up and wide, evoke lonely silence and unease, while moments of fury are punctuated with swathes of red. Throughout, Lai skilfully shows how Cannon’s relationships transform, often via conversations that feel innocuous until the characters’ expressions and quiet reactions are revealed. Additionally, Cannon’s racial and queer identity is acknowledged on the page without interrogation, making for a sincere, refreshing representation of realities we often do not see in fiction. 

Rather than an escape, Cannon is a painfully and earnestly realistic graphic novel. It explores Cannon’s struggles with her commitments, her restrained anger, her fraying friendships, and ageing family, and her emotions are so vivid that I could feel her anxiety spiralling across each panel. It centres Cannon’s perspective as a queer, second-generation Chinese woman with a level of honesty that feels rare, but every experience and character is so fleshed out that the novel’s strength becomes its ability to show life’s tenderness and cruelty, and the mundane parts in-between. For that reason, I think there is much more that could be said about Cannon besides the things that struck me hardest. But now that I know what Lai’s capable of, I look forward to reading her past work, and anything she releases in the future.  
 
References

Chau, Shannon. ‘The curse of the (eldest) Asian daughter.’ The Oxford Student, 20 January 2024. www.oxfordstudent.com/2024/01/20/the-curse-of-the-eldest-asian-daughter
Vadakumchery, Tracy. ‘Is It Eldest Daughter Syndrome, Or Is It Something Else?’ The Bad Indian Therapist, 29 October 2025. thebadindiantherapist.com/indian-therapist-blog/south-asian-eldest-daughter-syndrome.
 
ISABEL HOWARD is a Filipino Australian writer based in Nipaluna / Hobart. Her work has previously been published by Mascara Literary Review, Contemporary Art Tasmania’s Journal, kindling & sage, and more. Having completed her Honours in creative writing at the University of Tasmania, she is currently working towards completing a young adult fiction novel.

Terry Widders reviews Peter of Dhirri-aay-aay by Polly Cutmore and David Paull

Peter of Dhirri-aay-aay

by Polly Cutmore and David Paull

Mehi Books

Reviewed by Terry Widders

 

Peter of Dhirri-aay-aay by Polly Cutmore and David Paull, presents a broad history of the (Indigenous) Gamilraay people, pre-colonial to the present, of a region in north-west NSW (cf. general map on p.55). While the account has an often fulsome mix of oral and documentary sources, it’s in order that ‘the words of those who witnessed the events (…) provide the reader with insight into the people who made that history’ (p.5). In my reading, its purpose is to be a history of ‘truth telling (in order to) promote recognition and acceptance of past wrongs (and) not to point blame for the past’ (p.147).

The book’s contents contain a foreword, which presents a forthright “summary” of the book, nine (9) chapters, an epilogue, four appendices and end notes combining source references and a bibliography. In this review, I group the book’s nine chapters into two themes, and provide commentary. Firstly is the theme of Country, Contact and Colonisation (chps. 1-6) for which the general map (p.55) is quite a useful, complementary reference.

In exploring Country, Peter of Dhirri-aay-aay (Chp. 1) describes an ancestral homeland of the Gamilraay nation, its pre-contact geography, economy, social and language structures, as well as material culture (e.g; tools) and archaeological sites. This was home to a large, mature ‘traditional’ society of some 5,000 people, circa 1830.

An ‘historical thread’, Peter (Cutmore 1) is linked to Dhirri-aay-aay, the ‘traditional’ place, and later ‘woven’ into a more complete, historical person through the book’s second theme. A photograph of “old” Peter can be found on p.7.

Notable aspects of the invasion and contact history of Country are the Bigge Report: 1822-’23, War, Gold Rushes and Land Reforms. The Bigge Report, a British parliamentary ‘initiative’, recommended the replacement of the penal colony of NSW by a ‘free’ colony of pastoral landholders and workers. This unleashed a widespread ‘land grab’ after 1823, particularly on the western side of the dividing range, by existing, and potential, landholding interests. The other aspect, that of a ‘free’ colony, was left for later, historical clarification.

Contact history (War) is recorded in chapters. 2-4, and Colonisation in chps. 5,6. This well-documented time span of twenty 20 years (1831 – 1851) begins with early, “benign” (British) contact (a couple of explorers and the odd escaped convict) then a sudden, invasive rush of stockmen (on horses) with guns, sheep and cattle. An armed Gamilraay response ensued, followed by the 1838 massacres (of different, large Gamilraay groups). Intermittent, often sustained, Gamilraay “guerilla warfare” continued up to 1845, then ended.

War: “War” could only officially exist between two, or more, ‘sovereign’ entities. The Crown (colony) considered itself one, and the “natives” (Gamilraay) as subject to the laws of the Crown. ‘Ipso facto’, no war. If the ‘natives’ were ‘sovereign’, a different ‘war’ and ‘post-war’ relationship would exist.

Throughout the so-called ‘armed non-warfare’ period (c 1835 – 1845) official, colonial governance “concerns” were publicly expressed through letter writing and official documentation of “illegal actions”, as were religious/humanitarian protest (e.g; calls for “cease and desist” and/or “protectionist intercession”).

Peter, now a teenager, is presumed to have been among the survivors. He ‘pops up’ as a verifiable, historical adult later in the book. However, two realities became established on this part of the ‘colonial frontier’ by the 1850’s. The ‘pastoral dispossession’ of Gamilraay land became officially authorised: ‘land grabs’ were measured – as acreage – certified and taxed, while the surviving Gamilraay, ‘guess-timated’ at 1,000 or so persons, were officially recognised as being in need of protection!

From 1851 two major goldfields in Victoria, in Ballarat and Bendigo and, by 1867, several ‘secondary’ ones along the eastern side of NSW to Gympie, Queensland had attracted ‘tens of 1,000’s’ of (mainly) men into S-E Australia; an ‘immigration tsunami’! This initially created ‘consumer bases’ on the goldfields then, after the ‘rush(es)’, they merged with town/city populations to create and/or expand their ‘consumer bases’. ‘Urban’ based colonies began developing, though their ‘free’ nature was yet to develop.

‘Mini’, internal migrations of mainly men to these goldfields also happened, drawing labour away from existing pastoral and other workplaces. Consequently, it seems that from the 1850’s a particular trend appeared; Gamilraay labour – female and male – was becoming central to the now established pastoral stations, as paid and/or ‘paid in kind’ workers! Peter, who was now in his late 30’s was a valued general station worker, with particular skills as a ‘boundary rider’.

A second emerging theme which the authors explore in chapters 7 to 9 of Peter of Dhirr-aay-aay concerns ‘re-creation.’
The Gamilraay had barely begun adapting to their “worker niche” in the pastoral industry when three further “winds of change” – Land Reform II, (Aboriginal) Protection Policy and an act of Gamilraay “Self Determination” – propelled them to their current “historical position” of occupying a significant “citizen/worker” niche in the Moree township.

Land Reforms took place from 1861, with further reforms from 1884 – 1901, following the “land grab” phase as the NSW government responded to a rapidly growing need for agricultural produce such as grains, fruit and vegetables, and, an equally growing demand for a piece of the “land pie.” These involved land grants being made, from 40 acres to a maximum of 320 acres, on remaining “crown land” and/or land resumed from existing pastoral “grabs”. These grants had specific ownership conditions, such as fencing.

The three reform phases (1861, 1884 and 1901) were intended to expand the different acreage ‘selections’ proportionately across the east, central and western regions of the NSW colony, particularly so for families. The consequence for the Gamilraay (and other indigenous groupings) was that there became fewer ‘worker niches’ in the pastoral/agricultural industries.
Peter took on the surname of ‘Cutmore’, the same as that of a valued employer.

Aboriginal Protection Policy: 1880 – 1885 (and beyond)
By 1880 remaining Gamilraay “living places” (small, protected Crown land lots), the people and their living conditions became a ‘matter of concern’ for a small group of pastoralists, the ‘Association for the Protection of Aborigines’. The (colonial) state assumed this ‘concern’ in 1883 with the appointment of an official ‘Protector’, then an official, appointed Board in 1885, to create an ‘Aboriginal Protection Board’ (APB). The Gamilraay “living places” came under formal APB control in 1892.
With place (‘reserve’) and people now their official legal responsibility, the APB then ‘re-classified’ Gamilraay ‘native’ as ‘Aborigine/al’, with further ‘visual, sub-categories’; e.g; ‘full blood, half caste’ down to ‘octoroon’. [‘European’ remained a ‘natural’, fixed category].

Then, in 1915, the APB gave itself a key, discretionary, ‘social engineering’ power over ‘Aboriginal’ children: ‘in loco parentis’ [Latin: in place of parent(s)]. The APB could decide ‘why’ an [Aboriginal] child’s/children’s (home) living circumstances were ‘not appropriate’, remove ‘her/him/they’ and place one or more in an APB determined, ‘more appropriate’ setting. And they did. Thus became the ‘Removed Generation’! Now in his late 40’s Peter marries Kate Harrison (from Glen Innes) in 1887.

Gamilraay Self-Determination: 1917 – Present
Due to their rejection of the APB’s ‘in loco parentis’ power, and its increasing use by that body, Peter Cutmore 1 and wife Kate Harrison decided to make the ‘pioneering move’ with their grandchildren from their post-colonisation ‘base’ at Dhirri-aay-aay to what became the Top Camp’ on the fringe of Moree township, and made that their ‘new, independent home’. Their adult family members joined them soon after. The year was 1917.

Other Gamilraay families and individuals followed later (1920’s), some joining Kate and Peter at the ‘Top Camp’ or forming other ‘communities’ at other locations around the fringes of Moree. All were on ‘their’ land – neither APB reserve, pastoral nor crown/local government. ‘Independent’ From such beginnings, described as ‘bases’, there continued the literal re-creation of families, and the ongoing re-creation of ‘new’ social/cultural identities.

Here, a general map would have been useful in illustrating this process, noting physical features such as ‘camp sites’, over time, vis-à-vis Moree township, the Mehi river, other waterways, roads, and a compass. Of historical note to the family, Peter Cutmore 1 died in 1927 (exact age unknown).

The two historical ‘trajectories’ of Gamilraay and Moree merged from 1917. Both ‘pasts’ continuing to live in the same ‘present’, their respective families now seventh generational, and counting. Peter of Dhirri-aay-aay implicitly poses the question: who, and how to make ‘our’ common future?

Polly Cutmore writes that the book celebrates the survival of her great great grandfather and his descendants through decades of colonisation and genocide. It includes previously unpublished accounts of the early massacre period from the Gwydir River region of NSW.
 

 TERRY WIDDERS’ family and cultural network extends from the Macleay river valley (Dhangadi/Kempsey), across the New England tableland (Armidale) to Moree (Gamilraay). After graduate and postgraduate studies Widders had a twenty-year academic teaching career, including research/lived experience in the Asia/Pacific region, his broader sense of ‘home.’

TextaQueen

TextaQueen is a non-binary, disabled, settler-immigrant Goan writer, curator and artist living on Wurundjeri Country. Wielding tools beyond their namesake felt-tip, they present creative non-fiction, personal essays, satire, and poetry about othered bodies, land, power, trauma, and their relationships. Their writing has appeared in Disability Arts Online, Peril, Bollywouldn’t, and Crip Stories. They have performed their poetry and creative storytelling as a guest for Ilbijerri’s Foley and on tour with Radar Production’s Sister Spit across Turtle Island (USA and Canada). Texta received a 2023 Writers Victoria Writeability Fellowship for mentorship with Natalie Harkin.

Photograph by Pia Johnson.

 
return

traffic through double glass
thrum of a world beyond
           the return to normal
they’re sold on a solid idea
relief is ahead
destinations on offer again
desired things ready to be found

outside is a world
determined to meet its end
inside we sit alone and take note

left behind      out of time
we continue to make time obsolete
voice notes skim oceans in an instant
        first words i’ve spoken out loud today
DM Seen 3:14am
        chain-smoking loneliness since 2020 <3
discord from ableds shared in an app
        omfg i’d have a meltdown too
threads stitch us      together out-of-sync

group chat alert vibrates
somewhere under blankets pets pills
phone as hard to find as spoons
our connection untied to consistency
we send each other ease we wish to feel
our choirs meet on screens
wormholes to let us warble
        there is no path to light
    no A to B to Z
        no numbers will be called
    there is nothing to fail
        productivity is fake
    success is brief illusion

our harmonies fade out the hum
return us to each other
back to the disabled future

Notes
‘spoons’ as units measuring finite disabled capacity coined by Christine
Miserandino in The Spoon Theory.
‘productivity is fake’ from a lutte collective poster and t-shirt design that reads
‘time is not real/productivity is fake/what you produce doesn’t matter’.
‘back to the disabled future’ alludes to Leah Lakshmi Piepzna-Samarasinha’s
book The Future is Disabled.

 

this flower has a spine

on my footpath i find a flower
it has a spine
moves like a centipede
thin black petal legs
encased in carbonite shell
blood of liquid copper
invisible to everyone but me

i pick it up
for my white polo buttonhole
fifty of one hundred legs
tickle my neck
we wriggle in my uniform

i carry it on the school bus
kids-a-tumble bubble
the melting pot
ready to liquefy me
my flower’s cool felt feet
patter rhythms on my collarbone
we stay solid together

everyone underwatch in class
butts suction to plastic seats
my companion dares to free itself
scuttles across my desk
jumps around the room
past    teacher
        chalkboard
    wall charts
slithering in the ears of every kid
learning how to be one
my clever friend returns to me
sits up on my shoulder
reports its research
whispering clicks and whistles
slides back inside my shirt

if only i understood its language
 
 
POEM: prescribed for the temporary relief of pain

care note: self harm
 
DIRECTIONS FOR USE

• Ball fist until nails break skin
    ° place palm on margarita rim
    ° salt the red crescents
    ° savour the sting

• Bite inside of cheek hard
    ° taste sweet metal seep
    ° refuse ice if offered
    ° wait for welt to form

• Outside club sit drunk in gutter
    ° hit head against concrete
    ° until someone intervenes
    ° or skull cracks

• Drag kitchen knife against wrist
    ° if too dull to draw blood
    ° get some help
    ° to sharpen the blade

• Run boiling bath to full
    ° sink in without flinching
    ° submerge with open eyes
    ° see if you survive

Lisa Collyer reviews Bathypelagia by Debbie Lim

Bathypelagia

by Debbie Lim

Cordite Books

ISBN 978-0-6457616-6-5

A review by LISA COLLYER

Bathypelagia is Debbie Lim’s first poetry collection (a chapbook Beastly Eye  appeared in 2012, with Vagabond Press) and is similarly preoccupied with the blurred line between human animals and wild fauna. If Bathypelagia is read in the context of production of the global shit show, the descent into the midnight zone seems a place of respite. There is a domestic feel to these poems, following a lover, a child, or the petrified remains of ordinary people in the wake of a volcanic eruption. The descent into the farthest and furthest depths of the ocean also hint to rising seawaters in the context of the Anthropocene, and the necessity to look towards havens of resilience when the lights go out.

The first section of the collection, ‘Midnight zone’ begins profoundly in the bathyal zone and is a pragmatic exploration of romance in the dark. The poem ‘Love Below 2000 Metres’ (p.3) is sensually survivalist, as sex takes place grappling in the dark, wrought out of desperation to feed, to hide, to spawn, and accidentally consummate.

It is difficult to speak of love at these depths.
Instead we live by other callings: attraction, hunger,

a fatal curiosity. Attempts at transcendence merely
destroy us. The only way to survive: make a bower

out of darkness. Or invent your own light:
worm of deception, burning weed, false ship of safety.

‘Love Below 2000 Metres’
(p.3)

If transcendence is the goal of art, then Lim’s poems are the benchmark to erasing the spatial borders between beings. In ‘My Son the cephalopod’ (pp.8-9) the zoomorphic characterisation of the small child slipstreams between octopus and infant. The camouflage of beast or baby, only a mother could love (fuelled by chemicals) with its oversized head, and mercurial moods: love and hate sidle. The poem tracks the tireless work of a parent dealing with the dependent yet independent-seeking child: their tentacles grasping for choke hazards, or projecting food for wall art. Finally, the parent’s attempts at constraint are tentacles cradled beneath the covers and the embrace of sea swell.

‘Every night
I rattle on about the moon, tuck tentacles down
and attempt to rock in a way that resembles
the movement, the approximate weight
of an ocean.’

‘My son the cephalopod’
(pp.8-9)

In the witching hour, men sleep, in a unique ecosystem on the bottom of the ocean while the speaker (perhaps female) observes and acts: a nod to the lion share caring load women carry. There is talk of coupling for reproduction and a setting free of offspring. Occasionally there is longing when a flash mob of top feeders or a sinking carcass bedazzles. But a resigned lack of romance prevails, except the sensory rhythmic patterns gently lulling the reader into a comforting acceptance of life without light.

Sometimes I miss the old life.
Occasionally, we receive fresh news
from above (a flash migration, the latest slick)
but the buzz rarely lasts. Then it’s back

to the grind as usual.

‘A Bar in Bathypelagia’
(pp.10-11)

Lim’s animal explorations are landed too, in museums or conserved in fossils, indicating the longevity of life beyond the watery depths, in poems, such as ‘A Taxidermied Sunfish’ (p.12) and ‘The Fossil Maker’ (pp.13). This continuous lineage works elegantly with the themes of reproduction, memory, and culture that emanate across this sumptuous collection, with its lullaby rhythms toing-and-froing like the baby being swooned to sleep. We too, are invited to sink and accept the darkness, make our own light, and find ways to cope.

There is tension in the second part ‘Fin, Bone’ where the domestic transforms to a suffocating cage where untamed mythic beasts seek freedom in a series of intertextual explorations. The blistering poem, ‘Love Note from the Medusa’ (p.21) uses the first-person speaker to occupy the gorgon in kinky overtures, one who speaks of agency and unyielding desire.

‘Underestimated,
I trail my tangled
boudoir, chains
lit up with toxins.
I am (in fact) not
vain, simple self-
sufficient, loyal
to the old currents
and my own
slow lacy appetites.’

‘Love Note from the Medusa’
(p. 21)

Transformation also comes in the form of bound feet, in a numbered poem, that reads like an instruction manual with imperatives on how to turn feet into lotus bulbs. The complicit mutilation is instigated by the mother on the daughter and continues (until outlawed), following cultural traditions, in an eerily prosaic tone. Beauty and abjection embrace and repel beneath the sole. There is an intersectional feminist probe: of gender, culture and class here, where the bound feet transform the woman with lotus feet into one, who is waited upon, rather than being the one to serve.

4.
Every second day
turn your ears to stone. Unwrap
the bandage and ignore her crying

as you re-bind them,
each time tighter. Remind yourself,
as your own mother did,
that there is no such thing as a truly
liberated foot.’

‘How to Grow Feet of Golden Lotus’ (pp. 32-34)

Lim’s poems converse with one another, often with the the motif of stone. Whether it be ‘ears to stone’ (‘How to Grow Feet of Golden Lotus’ (pp. 32-34) or passive representations of ‘Women in classical Chinese love poems’ (p.35) to the petrified ‘Bodies of Pompeii’ (p.36). Recall the Medusa? The mise-en-scene of an unexpected domestic death are bodies mid-sentence, crawling away, and halted by the infamous volcanic eruption of Vesuvius in 79 BC. The abrupt endings of each line mimic the truncated lives, yet entombed in legend, ordinary lives now transcended to museum artefacts.

‘Unburied, they weigh more than bone ever could.
They have shaken off the ash and refuse to rest. So many

stopped limbs. Mouth holes, eye holes, a balled fist.’

‘Bodies of Pompeii’ (p.36)

The concluding section ‘Air’ draws breath and brings life to ground, beginning with our museum obsession with exhibiting exotica. The violent romance of ‘Hauling the Sunfish into the Gallery’ (p. 45) speaks to the human desire of scientific classification and public curiosity. We are challenged to see our perverse curios as rebirthed, while the ungainly wrenching from the ocean is cleverly wrought in a one-way bargaining agreement between collector and fish.

‘I have noticed the fused bones of your mouth
set in their small surprised o. How, tentative,

you near my gaping window. I say only this:

think of it as a second birth, your odd calling.’

‘Hauling the Sunfish into the Gallery’ (p. 45)

Lim’s poems often sit side by side in a conversation of opposites, like ‘Captive’ (p. 50) where death (a blue ringed octopus) is caught then humanely released, and ‘Praying Mantis’ (p.51) the only living thing in a brush of dead wood. Or ‘Gift of the Sloth (p.52) another instruction manual on occupying tree habitat, and the way in which the fur of the sloth is habitat to ‘beetles, moths and mites’ (p. 52). This poem is juxtaposed to ‘Etiquette for Trees’ (p. 53) with directives of courtesy for the sake of safety in polite (arboreal) society.

‘Respect the branch tips
of others. Learn to get by
on minimal sleep (which is, in any case,
intended for the weak and mobile).
But travel your roots boldly
through darkness and to great depths’

‘Etiquette for Trees’ (p. 53)

Lim’s Bathypelagia is a collection of multidimensional expansiveness. The auricles of an ear, the habitat of sloth fur, or the plumbs of the ocean are occupied by beings of fur, fin, and flesh interchangeably. The domestic zone (a cage of sorts) is transcended with imagination that migrates beyond atmospheres, beneath and above. The lines between these zones are blurred and the status of beings transcended. A bound foot is a girl mutilated, yet elevated; or the noxious fumes of a volcano elevate everyday life to exhibit status.
 
LISA COLLYER is the author of two poetry collections, Gold Digger (2025) and How To Order Eggs Sunny Side Up (2023), the latter being short-listed for The Dorothy Hewett Award, and both published with Life Before Man Books. Her personal essay, ‘Prolonged Exposure’ is published in the anthology, Women of a Certain Courage (2025) with Fremantle Press. Her poem, ‘The Grape Pickers’ was short-listed for the Gwen Harwood Poetry Prize (2025). She was a recent artist in residence for The National Trust of W.A. and Bundanon Art Museum. She is currently writing a literary novel on grief, booze and jazz.

Rozanna Lilley

Rozanna Lilley is a widely published researcher and author writing across multiple forms. Her work is included in Best Australian Essays (2013 and 2014) and Best (of) Australian Poems (2015 and 2023). Her short stories are published in anthologies and literary journals. Her memoir Do Oysters Get Bored? (UWA Publishing, 2018) was shortlisted for the National Biography Award. A poetry chapbook, The Lady in the Bottle (London: Black Spring Press), was released in 2023.

 

By-the-wind sailor

A blustery wimple frames impassive features
tan stockings puddled by saltwater
periwinkles clinging to her rough tunic
the deep space of sea-stars scattered in prayer

At inlet’s edge
a girl digs a hole in damp sand
rearranges svelte limbs
a trio of Barbie beach dolls
reclining by the edge of an infinity pool
sipping signature cocktails

Her mother packs the sunlit afternoon
into an overflowing tote
grasps her little sister’s searching hand
and calls her home

Beyond the inlet
the coffle of low dunes
then the open sea
thousands of by-the-wind sailors
their glittering blue bodies
adrift on riotous waves

Winter solstice

At the glass house on the headland
hours contract

Record the fact another year
such skittering distances

To the south the lub-dub
of surf crashing

Through the long night
mice rustling under the sink

Sampling a showbag
of prescription meds

Inhalers and inhibitors
anti-this-and-that

Lacelike veins entangled
skirting the isthmus

To the north a placid bay
a pair of white-bellied sea eagles

Circling the island
inside-out pockets

Of drip-tipped rainforest
a spit of shell grit

Searching safe anchorage
as dawn gathers

The ashen scent
of rejection nestled

Within frosted curves
a daybreak splash of

Flickering vermillion
lights up these empty rooms

 

Jo Langdon

Jo Langdon is a writer and educator living on unceded Wadawurrung land. Her poetry collections are Snowline (Whitmore Press, 2012) and Glass Life (Five Islands Press, 2018), with Delivery published by Vagabond in 2026. She has received fellowships from the Elizabeth Kostova Foundation, the National Library of Australia and the Wheeler Centre, and her recent work is published in journals including Island, Meanjin and Overland.

 
 

In her flat in Warsaw
After an image of the artist Alina Szapocznikow

She looks at what looks,
improbably, like an iPhone. It is

1953 (thereabouts), she is
approaching the frame’s

edge: ponytail to peep-toe sequence
of sideways strokes, softer

than the tablecloth’s bars
in monochrome, ambiguous face

on the wall, onlooking—
From palm and fingertip, a

neat click of compact opening
windows—clack—within the room

Misbah Wolf reviews Growing Up Indian in Australia Ed. Aarti Betigeri

Growing Up Indian in Australia

Edited by Aarti Betigeri,

Black Inc

Reviewed by MISBAH WOLF

 

Growing Up Indian in Australia is a collection that resists neat summary. What it offers instead is an accumulation of lived moments—memories, ruptures, negotiations of identity—that sit between cultures, between generations, and between belonging and estrangement. The stories do not attempt to resolve these tensions. Rather, they dwell within them, allowing multiple, sometimes contradictory experiences to coexist.

Reading this collection, I found myself engaging as a reader, but as someone who also exists between worlds—raised in 1980s Brisbane with a Pakistani father who did not speak much English and a white mother. Many of these stories felt deeply familiar to me. Not identical, but recognisable in their emotional texture: the small humiliations, the negotiations, the quiet adaptations. There is a shared undercurrent across the anthology that belonging is not simply given, but continually shaped through memory, environment and social expectation.

One of the most striking formal elements of the collection is the inclusion of childhood photographs alongside many of the stories. These images create a subtle but powerful dialogue between past and present. It feels as though the adult voice is in conversation with the child self—the child finally being given space to speak, to be seen, and to be understood. The result is not nostalgic, but reflective and, at times, reparative—it is in a true sense the Hero/Heroine’s Journey.

Across the anthology, many of the stories begin with a single, cutting line that anchors the reader in a moment of exposure. In Shamna Sanam’s Dual Identities Down Under, the opening—“Ever since primary school, I have felt out of touch with my Australian peers”—immediately establishes a sense of distance. This is grounded in everyday experiences: bringing idli and coconut chutney to school with embarrassment, anticipating comments about smell, and being asked reductive questions such as “Do you speak Indian?” or whether Indians “eat curry every day.”

What is particularly striking is how these external moments become internalised. Sanam poses a series of questions: “Is it bad if I keep hold of my culture? … Is it bad if I hate Vegemite? … Is it bad if I’m not the smartest in maths and science?” These culminate in the more confronting question: “Is it bad if I and other Indian women, men and children don’t meet your standards?” Here, Australianness is revealed not as neutral, but as a set of expectations against which difference is measured. At the same time, the piece moves toward a more reflective position, acknowledging that some of these early encounters are shaped by childhood ignorance and that identity does not need to be hidden in order to belong.

Michelle Cahill’s A Chutney Alphabet of Anglo-Indian Spells approaches identity through fragmentation, using the structure of an alphabet to move between memory, language and experience. Familiar elements—food, family, ritual—sit alongside moments of racialisation and erasure. The line “My Australian school friends overlooked the dark history that textbooks erased” situates personal memory within a broader national context, where histories are selectively remembered or omitted, and we do indeed live in a country that was invaded and an entire history and place never ceded.

Sharon Verghis’ A Tale of Three Beaches reconfigures the Australian beach as a shifting and politically charged space. What begins as a site of “camouflage and acceptance and a tribe” becomes, in the context of the Cronulla riots, a site of exclusion. The movement between Klang and suburban Sydney highlights the sensory dislocation of migration, contrasting dense, layered soundscapes with an almost artificial quiet. The story ultimately gestures toward a form of reclamation, suggesting that identity is something carried across places rather than fixed within them.

In Natasha Pinto’s When I’m in Australia, and When There’s No One I Know, identity is shaped through inherited memory- the memories we carry from our mothers, our fathers and those silences too. The opening image of a mother falling near a train station, alone and unaided, becomes foundational—an expression of vulnerability that carries across generations. The pressure to belong manifests through code-switching, altered accents, and the striking image of a child flipping her hand to reveal a “white” palm as proof of belonging.

Questions of gender and performance emerge in Hardeep Dhanoa’s Feeling Free in Kings Cross, where the expectations of being a “good Indian girl” are set against the desire for autonomy and self-expression. Similarly, Kishor Napier-Raman’s An Incomplete Guide to Every Type of Brown Guy in the West uses humour and classification to catalogue different masculine archetypes, revealing the confusion and contradictions that arise within diasporic identity.

Kavita Bedford’s Practising Yoga explores cultural appropriation and internal dislocation in a globalised context. The narrator reflects on the experience of seeing her cultural heritage reframed through wellness spaces, where “200-hour Anglo yoga teachers” become authoritative voices. The question—“Just because I can say the words and have the blood, does it really mean I have some claim over them?”—captures a deep ambivalence. The story moves between these spaces and broader geopolitical realities, creating a dissonance that culminates in the repeated line, “I am scared, I am scared, I am scared.” The question that follows—“What is the child’s pose for being trapped between worlds?”—resonates as one of the central tensions of the collection.

In Rachael Jacobs’ My Other Mother, the relationship to the “motherland” is framed as both formative and confronting. The narrator’s encounter with India as a child introduces an awareness of inequality, complexity and responsibility that cannot be undone. “The knowledge of the life you could have lived is a blessing and a curse,” she writes, capturing the enduring impact of that awareness. The story moves beyond pity, instead holding both the beauty and difficulty of that connection.

Across the collection, there are also quieter but persistent traces of longer histories—colonial entanglements, cultural translation, and the afterlives of empire. These are not always foregrounded, but they are felt in the tensions that run through the narratives, in the sense that identity is shaped not only by personal experience but by historical forces that continue to reverberate.

With its range of voices, Growing Up Indian in Australia does not attempt to present a singular account of identity. Instead, it offers multiplicity—stories that sit alongside one another without needing to resolve into a unified whole. What emerges is a collection that creates space: for reflection, for contradiction, and for voices that articulate what it means to live between worlds- liminal but very deeply corporeal.

 
MISBAH WOLF is a poet and performer, and the co-editor of Crip Stories. She was shortlisted in the Wesley Michel Wright prize for Rooftops in Karachi. She has received a grant from Creative Victoria, and is a Red Room Poetry Fellow in 2026.

Jason Gray

Jason Gray is the multi-racial Mauritian Australian author of prize-winning book, HAUNT (THE KOOLIE) (Subbed In, 2019), and the winner (2012) and judge (2018-2019) of Zine West Word. He has been published widely, including The Suburban Review, Australian Poetry Journal, Written Off Club, Overland, Liminal Mag’s Collisions, Griffith Review, Zine West and Seizure. He was the recipient of a West Words Varuna Fellowship (2018) and long-listed for the University of Canberra Vice-Chancellor’s International Poetry Prize (2023).

 

 

Family Tree (Missing in History)

I had two parents. One is Black/Brown and alive.
I had four grandparents. Two were Black/Brown.
Both didn’t know they were Black, or at least didn’t want to be.
At least one pretended to be white.
I had eight great-grandparents. Four were Black/Brown.
I had 16 great-great-grandparents.
7 out of 8 Mauritians were Black/Brown.
I have found 29 out of 32 great-great-great grandparents.
8 out of 13 Mauritians found were potentially Black/Brown.
I have found 36 out of 64 fourth-great-grandparents. 6 out of 10
Mauritians found were potentially Black/Brown.
I have found 47 out of 128 fifth-great-grandparents. 5 out of 13
Mauritians found were potentially Black/Brown.
The list goes on. Black/Brown Créole Mauritian ancestors
mostly diminishing
from sight, missing
in history.
I have at least five potentially enslaved people as ancestors,
but the list would go on, if
it existed

Paul Scully reviews The Drop Off by David Stavanger

The Drop Off

by David Stavanger

Upswell

ISBN 978-0-6459840-8-8

Reviewed by PAUL SCULLY

David Stavanger’s The Drop Off is a reflection on divorce and shared parenthood and a paean of sorts to his son, interrupted by expressions of world weariness with the institutions of modern capitalism, an alternative alienation, and near-ekphrastic reactions to a painting by Marcel Duchamp and a photograph George Karger (of Marcel Duchamp). Stavanger’s evident love and admiration for his son, to whom the work is dedicated, offsets the bitterness that surfaces occasionally and withstands the humour that tends more to sublimate than expunge the irony. It is hard to gauge when the divorce poems might have been written given his son is almost an adult by the end of the collection.

Stylistically, The Drop Off is a collage of forms–verse and prose poetry, satire, the recompilation of found or invented phrases, redactions, what might pass as micro-fiction and even a table of wordplay he labels ‘Dad/Bingo’, and is framed as one continuous collection. Within that, ‘The Drop Off’ is a sequence of sixteen parts that starts at no. 3. It is prefaced by ‘The Chess Game’, the first of the Duchamp poems where, perhaps somewhat tartly, “we’re willing to sacrifice our Queens” and “One day we’ll play/without consent order/on the outskirts of Paris” (p11); ‘I’ve been thinking about your birth lately’, in which “I crave the crown of fine hair, the physicality of the child” (p12) and “It’s hard to say what kind of parents we will become./ There’s no way to inoculate against this future heartbreak” (p13), the second line of retroactive effect; and ‘Joint Statement’, which abounds in seemingly cut-out “post-truth” (p14) euphemisms that attempt a positive and mutual gloss on the decision to separate, e.g. “parting ways is as natural as procreating” (p14) and “we have mutually resolved to end this transaction amicably” (p14) yet, at the same time, “it’s really hard to hard-launch this divorce” (p15). This is humour with a sardonic edge and pleads for a human place in the production process that divorce has become.

‘The Drop Off’ itself chronicles the immediate aftermath of the divorce, that “modern dilemma” (p16), the new rituals of the drop off, the pick-up and the “duck pond” (p18) as neutral territory, the recalibration of Father’s Day, a move interstate and chaperoned flights, a third person “care navigator” (p27) to oversee exchanges, the emergence of new partners and the distance that might overtake communications with an ex-partner. The final stanza of this sequence (p31) captures the dislocation and loss engendered by these experiences but also the acceptance that his son needs to chart a way through them to find their own place:

Last night you dreamt about receiving a call
requesting you come down to the station
to verify your son’s identity. You offered
the officer memories, together and apart.
The dream police don’t accept these as proof.
They show you a photo of who your son could be.
When you are awake, they are free to choose their fate.

Stavanger changes tack for the next twenty pages or so and, four poems in, to prose formats. As suggested earlier, these changes are not announced by a new section, but are offered possibly as the next movement in a symphony of sorts that will return eventually to its underlying theme in later movements. Things are not as sequestered as this sounds and concerns occasionally bleed across each other as you might expect in something that is as both conscious and sub-conscious as poetry. An alternative take might be that the poet has been rendered generally out-of-joint with the world.

This is not intended to invalidate the concerns he expresses which range across the environment, militarism and commerce. The personal also intrudes in a variety of medical settings. Examples of the poetry here include:

If it burns, tax it. If it keeps burning, regulate it. And if it stops
burning, subsidise it. I am sick of the government being in my life.

– ‘[We’re going to get nailed]’, p33.

Henry Kissinger is dead.
Never a war he didn’t adore.
‘Credible military threats’ can be subdued.
– ‘Disconcerting tendencies’, p34.

… our lungs are an auditorium of unsustainable applause.

– ‘recline’, p36.

“The kidney that was removed when I was seventeen
is still out there seeking sensations, ghosts of organs

[3]

never mature into a functioning self”
– ‘Cystometrogram’, p38.

… Dentistry VS Psychiatry. Being in people’s mouths versus being in people’s heads. Psychiatrists =
no expensive equipment or supples. Still get to drill holes in people. Dentist = based on science and a
love of soft drinks. Still get to have an intimate relationship with someone in a chair.

– ‘← Intensifier →’, p42

The oscillation between oculist and occultist,
the crumpled coat on the road vs a dead body
[knowledge of the measurable/knowledge of the hidden].

– ‘Vision’, p50

The two currents merge more fully in ‘The Experience Economy’, which is presented in square-bracketed paragraphs and as extended, satirical wordplay. The poem journeys from childbirth, “a destination”, where “goods and services” are required as well as “unpaid labour” for the “assembly” work, the product of “the sensation of desire as existential demand, delivery as constant supply” and the “first-born … a non-fungible commodity” (pp54-57). The poem continues in this vein until “a shared calendar” emerges where “coloured squares will remind you who you planned to love”.

After traversing topics that range from swimming with his son, jaffas at the cinema, almost anachronistic perhaps, the Lindt café siege, a previously unknown sister from an out-of-wedlock relationship of the poet’s mother, kale as a substitute mother, buying a dog, child support, Texan relatives and the life of a tenant, the collection arrives at another important sequence with numbered instalments and concomitant with the parent theme, ‘Fifteen ways to be erased’, co-written by Stavanger and his son, Saul. It is an exploration of bullying, which “is a sea of faces, morphing and changing. Its only desire is to consume itself is consume itself” (p85). It is also an experience shared in different ways and times by father and son. There are aspects of refuge, subterfuge, moving schools and tendencies for authority figures to doubt the veracity of the report and advise parent and son to ignore name-calling. The latter are perhaps as damaging as the bullying–“Hesitation marks appear in the margins of my son’s learning. They begin to doubt words, even when they were written down or bolded in emails or on their own lips …Every adult … becomes unreliable” (p83). ‘Montage’ offers a happy ending of sorts where the protagonists’ relationship attains a warming and assured integrity–“David is holding the compression of time. Both hands are closed and open. Stills are spilling from his mouth (positive and negative). There are no other props or cast nearby” (p100).

David Stavanger is a wry commentator with a propensity and fondness for bons mots, but who nonetheless feels deeply. For me the two strands are not always double-helical, nor is the interweaving of the social with the intimate across poems in this unbroken collection. This is probably as much personal preference as criticism. What cannot be disputed is Stavanger’s love for his son and their graduation into a self-sustained life. Love strikes me as the ultimate destination of this collection, and we can all arrive happily there.

PAUL SCULLY is a Sydney-based poet with four published collections, the latest being The Literary Detective and Other Crimes published by Bonfire Press in 2025. He holds a Doctor of Arts from Sydney University. His work has been commended and shortlisted in major Australian poetry prizes and published in print and online journals in Australia, Ireland, the UK and USA. His website is http://paulscullypoet.com.au/.

Lucy Christopher reviews Hollow Air by Verity Borthwick

Hollow Air

by Verity Borthwick

Ultimo Press

ISBN 9781761154195

Reviewed by LUCY CHRISTOPHER

When I finished Hollow Air by Verity Borthwick and turned off my tiny reading light, it was suddenly tar-dark and death-quiet. Borthwick’s book had swallowed me; I was still stuck deep underground, navigating dusty tunnels, feeling my hand across sharp rock to get out and away. My heart was racing. I breathed deeper and listened to the room’s blackness in the hot late-summer night. Soon, I distinguished their breathing: my husband deep and steady, my daughter lighter and with a musical hum; both very much here, both real. I tried to ascend from the story that had gripped me by the throat until I discovered its end. My skin prickled with sweat, and there was grit stuck to my back and dust caught in the corners of my eyes.

This is how Hollow Air stayed in my body. For days afterward, my mind returned to the twisting underworld of the abandoned mining tunnels in the novel’s final, nightmarish scenes. Over and again, I imagined being trapped in the tunnels, contorting my body through ever-smaller gaps, scaling spider-like up crumbling walls with yawning chasms below. Unlike Sarah, the protagonist who eventually does discover a way through this erebus, I imagined being trapped forever underground, unable to ever see again, relying on touch and smell to find the possibility of an exit. I felt dirty and dusty and ill at ease, with a powerful desire to never visit the abandoned mines of far north Queensland, where the novel is set.

Notwithstanding my strongly visceral reaction, Hollow Air is a curious novel to describe. Various reviews have labelled Borthwick’s debut as a psychological thriller, a piece of rural gothic, or a modern Australian ghost story. Roslyn Jolly, in the Sydney Review of Books describes it as “…the latest addition.. [in the]…flourishing” canon of texts that is the “Australian mining novel.” In truth, it is all these things and yet, it is none of them deeply.

Set mostly in and around a mine in monsoonal, sweltering Queensland, the novel shifts between two timelines: an historical narrative from 1910 about the descent and ultimate death of Samuel and Tom in the Ada Dulcie mine, and the current-day story of Sarah, a geologist stationed alone at the same mine site, tasked with an unenviable job of trying to discover rock valuable enough to reopen it. Sarah’s isolation is shattered when a new team, including the sultry geologist Cole, arrives to start drilling, forcing her to re-navigate and position her body in an all-male environment. Though Sarah’s story is given the most weight, and page time, the back story of Samuel and Tom’s deaths intrudes and infiltrates everywhere, pressuring Sarah’s story with constant threat of ghostly presences and the sense that the past, and the deceit and tragedies that occurred there, will always erode the present.

Hollow Air is no doubt a novel preoccupied with the body. Borthwick’s writing is deeply sensory and atmospheric, her landscape never a passive setting but a seductive and fierce character and body in its own right. Throughout reading, I was tense, uncomfortable, looking over my shoulder for predatory creatures or questionable Australian men. There are many physical jumps and bodily prickles throughout the book – the near miss of a snake bite, the constant feeling of being watched, and many times where Sarah is surprised by a sudden arrival of a human, animal or something dead.

Borthwick cleverly brings the body, and its physicality, into this book in other ways too. Throughout, Borthwick describes the arid land as, and in parallel with, a human body:

“She could never get over the feeling of being the first human to lay eyes on this rock sliced out of the ground – was this how the early anatomists had felt when they cut into the body and saw the sinews tangled there? …. Like a doctor listening to a heartbeat with a stethoscope, you could feel the edges of the organ and wonder at its function, place your palm above it and feel the muscle pulse beneath your fingertips….” (97)

Borthwick also draws parallels between the land and Sarah herself, often suggesting the land is embodied, marked, and vulnerable in ways that mirror her own physical and psychological state: “…like the ground left behind when the ore was removed, she too was riddled with holes.” (49) At times, it even seems that the mine and Sarah’s body become entirely one being: “… she felt she had become part of the mine, that it now flowed in her veins and pooled in her gut.” (287-288)

The threat of danger – both to the land and to Sarah, the novel’s two central “bodies” – is ever-present, as is the potential for exploitation and abuse. Sarah, like the mined land she inhabits, has been shaped and damaged by her interactions with men, and both she and the land must ultimately have their cores cut open and their insides examined to uncover meaning in their own stories. Additionally, both Sarah and the land inflict their own suffering to the men who interact with them. Sarah misses her own engagement party to sleep with fellow geologist Cole, and the land traps and injures men who dare to transgress it. In this way, perhaps Borthwick’s novel seeks to examine how deeply our lives are entangled with the patriarchal and colonial mining industry we hold an uneasy relationship with; an industry that exploits and harms, leaving behind scars that are difficult to heal, yet one we remain dependent on for survival and prosperity in modern, settler Australia.

Throughout, Borthwick’s knowledge of her subject matter is assured and a significant strength of the novel. After reading, I felt not only dusty but as if I’d learnt something about how geologists assess a mining landscape in terms of its value as well as a deeper understanding of a mine’s sedimentary beauty. I also appreciated Borthwick’s female FIFO protagonist, whose capability is consistently evident; as physically and mentally strong as any other mining character ever written. However, while Sarah is no doubt a fascinating character, I did not find her particularly appealing or one always easy to understand. I struggled to grasp what Sarah saw in her fiancé Scott, or why she hadn’t ended the engagement earlier. We’re given little sense of what attracted Sarah and Scott together in the first place, or whether she was always so closed-off towards him. Cole, too, the book’s mysterious and threatening love interest, is not given much character depth. What is he beyond a beautiful body and bundle of secrets? What might he have brought to the story apart from threat and desire? Although, Borthwick’s landscape is layered with remarkable depth and texture, it seems the characters are, at times, afforded less of that same complexity.

Overall, Hollow Air is a significant and vivid Australian novel, one that places women in a role rarely seen in fiction and interrogates Australia’s relationship with its mining industry from the inside out. It’s exploration of the cost of concealing our ‘dirty little secrets’, whether they be personal or public, feels fresh and interesting. Ultimately, though, it is Borthwick’s ability to embed the sensory details of this world inside the bodies of her readers that make this novel linger long and uncomfortably. I am fascinated to see what she writes next.

Cited

Jolly, Roslyn. ‘Critical/Mineral’. Sydney Review of Books, 01 December 2025. https://sydneyreviewofbooks.com/reviews/criticalmineral

LUCY CHRISTOPHER is an award-winning author for young adults, children, and adults, with wide readership. Release, her recent psychological thriller for adults, was shortlisted for a Davitt Award and is currently in development for a TV series. She has worked as an academic in Creative Writing for twenty years, beginning her career at Bath Spa University, where she was a Reader in Creative Writing and Course Director on the world-renowned MA in Writing for Young People. She now works as Senior Lecturer in Creative Writing at the University of Tasmania, while juggling her best creative output yet: her daughter.

Katie Hansord reviews The Nightmare Sequence by Omar Sakr and Safdar Ahmed

The Nightmare Sequence

Omar Sakr and Safdar Ahmed

UQP

ISBN 9780702268908

Reviewed by KATIE HANSORD
 

Omar Sakr, readers will already know as an incredibly talented, prolific, and award-winning writer. Yet this collection is beyond, and so crucial in this moment. It is immensely powerful, intense, raw, and immeasurably heavy, yet it is at the same time delicately crafted, deeply sensitive, and soft. The poems are illustrated with beautiful artworks by Safdar Ahmed. This is a collection of poetry and illustrations that is on another level. Sakr’s poetic voice is a call to moral clarity and humanity that is so desperately needed in this moment. A call to humanity from the soul of heartbreak. The collection is a series of poems titled variously ‘…in the genocide’. A circling repetition that situates us always within the nightmare that the media and powerful would prefer to ignore, minimise, or outright deny, yet which cannot be unseen and must be confronted. As Randa Abdel-Fattah notes, this book is an “astonishingly original collaboration by two artists who are committed to the intimacies of humanity, the details of injustice, and uncompromising truth-telling” (n. pag.). These poems that Sakr originally shared on Instagram, as the genocide unfolded on our screens in horrific unbearable footage of children, babies, bodies, unfathomable destruction and anguish before our very eyes, forever changing everything. Some of these Nightmare Sequence poems were also originally published in various journals such as Westerly, Cordite, and Southerly, ‘Walking to day care in the Genocide’ (Southerly p.108), and have also appeared as translations, such as ‘Graze in the Genocide’ appearing in Cordite and Point de Chute, in which personal parenting experiences are simultaneously contextualised and contextualising the genocide within these deeply realised themes of love, protection, human connection, and care. The poems each hold a light of truth, grief, witness and care, like the many candles of a vigil, lit from the flame of love, together forming a beacon of hope to insist that this genocide is always the context, that this cannot be forgotten, normalised, accepted, and that we can never become numb to it.

In the face of such extreme dehumanisation and disregard for the enormous number of people, and the extreme number of children killed in Gaza – Sakr writes: ‘Every child’s corpse is mine, I fear / Not being able to undo this grim fatherhood, / I fear its undoing even more’ (‘Limits in the genocide’ 80). This profoundly emotionally honest collection opens with two quotations, and each poem intricately carries their traces, in its own ways. The first, from Isabella Hamad, who wrote the lines “To remain human at this / juncture is to remain in agony. Let us remain there: /It is the most honest place from which to speak.”, which is echoed in Sakr’s dual fears of not only ‘this grim fatherhood’ but the fear of ‘its undoing even more’ (80) – the undoing which would mean the undoing of truth, and of humanity itself. As this repetition in the titles continuously calls the reader back to this context of the unfolding nightmare, and the ongoing acknowledgement that each thing, each day that takes place does so ‘…in the genocide’. It is recalled, remembered, re-centred, repeatedly in a sequence of days, in the passage of ‘normal’ time and abstract, in its usual calendar of days marked and unmarked by holidays and observances of altered importance: in the minutia of the day-to-day, and in the cumulations of days – ‘100 days in the genocide’, ‘300 days in the genocide’, Ramadan, Mother’s Day, Father’s Day, Easter, in the genocide, and of specific dates. Sakr’s poems insist, rightly so, that everything we experience, is occurring ‘in the genocide’ – even that one date so centred by the western media, is here ‘October 7th in the Genocide’ a poem in which Sakr writes:

You think I fear to enter October 7th?
Habibi, I never left. I’m still there with you
Dying as I do every day. I admit I can’t see
the murdered you heap murder on.

For me the world breaks every day.
(65)

We, as readers, are reminded repeatedly that there need be no such reminder, and that nothing, for people of conscience, can ever be experienced ‘as usual’ without this outrage beyond comprehension being the wider context, and without its relationality to this unthinkably inhumane imperial genocide, being brought continuously back into both questioning and heartbreak. To not see things as the western media has presented them, but rather in terms of ‘humanity’ and its antithesis, hearts beating with love or death for us all – including the death of the heart. Sakr writes ‘My hands are cramped around a million epitaphs. / It will take me roughly all the time in the world to get there.’ (65)

On the facing page to ‘October 7th in the genocide’ is a high contrast black and white illustration by Safdar Ahmed. These artworks are interspersed throughout the collection and interact powerfully with the poetry. In this image, part of the ‘Genocide Culture’ series, there is a young, frightened child being held in a choke hold by a soldier with their military uniform, hat, gloves and equipment strapped on and wearing dark glasses covering the face, while the child is in a plain t-shirt with wide open eyes, this juxtaposition of power imbalance with the words ‘GENOCIDE’ and ‘CULTURE’ placed top and bottom in alternating black and white. A similar illustration faces the poem ‘Say in the genocide’

Say this has no purpose.
Say no one reads it.
Am I not alive to myself?
Say it is meaningful.
Say everyone reads it.
More, say it’s understood.
Now we’re talking.
Say my feeling meets yours
And together they deepen…
(p.54)

This precise meeting and deepening of feeling, in reading Sakr’s poems, feels impossible not to experience. This is the emotional level on which they operate, and readers in reading it enter into the second option, the creation of meaningfulness. Facing this poem is the illustration of men rounded up, sitting on the ground, their eyes covered with blindfolds, their hands tied behind their backs while an armed soldier stands over them. In the notes to these illustrations, these are described as ‘a series of images that attempts to highlight what our leaders cannot be brought to admit: that a ‘close friend’…is committing the most abhorrent crime humanity is capable of.’ (158).

Bearing witness to this nightmare, and embracing remembrance, solidarity and truth-telling, are linked themes. These are ways of maintaining our humanity, in the face of inhumanity, evoked here from the outset. We bear witness. Poems that emerge from living through a nightmare, terror, something that seems so horrific and so abhorrent to our moral values as human beings as to be beyond reality – the disbelief of immense grief as it is experienced.

This response recalls again the quotation from the eminent Palestinian poet Najwan Darwish:

“‘Who remembers the Armenians?’
I remember them
and I ride the nightmare bus with them
each night”

‘I remember them’ from Darwish’s 2014 Collection Nothing more to lose, the first collection to appear in English language. Darwish’s poem continues: “and my coffee, this morning /I’m drinking it with them”. Not only collective remembrance is being signified here but also a collective poetic solidarity, a reminder that, despite cultures of individualism, mythologies of the lone poet, we are not actually alone in our grief, or resistance, in our remembrance and our speaking against genocide, we are part of a larger thing, a collective of people who refuse to accept this horror. It recalls in turn Sarah M. Saleh’s lines from the poem ‘Say free Palestine’ – ‘for I love you say free Palestine’ – conveying this same sense that remembrance, and grief, which may be another side of resistance and liberatory will, permeates everything, each day, from coffee, to words to walks to daycare, to poetry to love to death. In ‘200 days in the genocide’ Sakr writes

I poem this.
Everything in the genocide
Is the shadow of a real
Me: a blunt tear
In the mouth of an angel.
(103)

To face the truth and express our grief and resistance, is a way to reach each other, to do so together.


References

Darwish, Najwan, Nothing more to lose, Penguin, 2014
Sakr, Omar, ‘Walking to day care in the Genocide’, Southerly, January vol. 80 no. 1 2025; (p. 108)
‘Graze in the Genocide’, Omar Sakr, 2024, Cordite Poetry Review, 1 February no 111 2024
‘Graze in the Genocide’ Omar Sakr, 2024, Point de Chute, Spring no. 8 2024
Saleh, Sarah M., The Flirtation of Girls / Ghazal el-Banat UQP 2023
 
 
KATIE HANSORD is a writer and researcher working on unceded Wurundjeri lands in Naarm. Her interests include poetry, intersectional feminism, anti-imperialism and disability justice. She is co-editor of Crip Stories (NewSouth). Her work appears in Unusual Work, Mascara, Southerly Long Paddock.

Koraly Dimitriadis reviews Discipline by Randa Abdel-Fattah

Discipline

by Randa Abdel-Fattah

UQP

ISBN 9780702271014

Reviewed by KORALY DIMITRIADIS

Dr Randa Abdel-Fattah’s novel Discipline is a narrative enquiry into politics, activism, power, and the hierarchies that exist within it through the third-person perspectives of Ashraf, a university academic of Lebanese descent, and Hannah, a journalist of Palestinian descent working for a right-leaning newspaper. Abdel-Fattah hooks you in immediately with relatable, vulnerable, witty and intelligent protagonists, characters and observations, her prose effortlessly shifting between melancholy, feminism, and humour, smashing stereotypes and giving us a real taste of multicultural Australia. 

Hannah is a young mother, married to Jamal, from Gaza. Ashraf is divorced, navigating a complex digital co-parenting dynamic, lamenting why ‘religion make[s] such fools of people’ (p.2) after his wife abandoned feminism for a strict Islamic life, moving to Yemen with their daughters and remarrying. As a single mother who has co-parented, I felt Abdel-Fattah captures the struggles of co-parenting, and motherhood, accurately.  

Set in Sydney-Australia’s Middle Eastern diaspora during Israeli-Palestinian conflict in Gaza, Discipline explores the guilt, privilege and responsibility of living so far away from your homeland when it’s hurting.  

Hannah knew that Jamal had learned to compartmentalise his rage and grief, had learnt a level of self-restraint that can perhaps only come from living through slow-cooked trauma (p.62)

Abdel-Fattah paints a picture of the diaspora and the way it functions and lives. Hannah mocks motherhood with an infectious dry sarcasm, clearly showing the reader that while she does follow some aspects of her culture like fasting, she certainly does not live a lifestyle of consumerism like many in the diaspora. Hannah cares more about human rights than being ‘pretentious enough to spend two hundred dollars on a [baby] dress that would end up covered in pureed apple and carrot stains’ (p.10). 

While Hannah and Jamal’s marriage operates in a more equal fashion than one might expect in immigrant communities, Abdel-Fattah still highlights disparity in gender expectations within such communities. When Jamal is confused about where the Dior baby dress is as Hannah is rushing out the door to work, Hannah instructed the night prior by her mother to ‘dress up’ Aya up because she has plans to ‘show off her grandchild’, Hannah responds to Jamal, ‘you’re capable of doing a PhD. Find it.’ (p.10). 

Hannah navigates frustrations like road rage and why we have to pay for toll roads that are slower than free roads, balancing her rage with her faith, relatable to those who are religious or grew up religious, as I did: 

She banged her hand on the steering wheel as she considered: Does swearing invalidate my fast? […] She lent out of the window and yelled, ‘Dickhead!’
(p.17)

This is how she begins, how she captivates you, her prose masterful, gently weaving in her politics as the novel unfolds, until you’re having uncomfortable conversations you’re not sure you should be having. But too bad. By that time, you’re invested. 

Discipline mimics the current toxic, entitled, white-washed status quo in Australia’s media and academia. While the Australian literary landscape is not covered, it most certainly isn’t any different, as all three sectors are interconnected. One would expect Discipline to be a dense read due to the subject matter, yet it isn’t, it’s light and engaging. Abdel-Fattah is controversial and brave in what she puts on the page, presenting arguments from many angles, even perspectives she might not agree with, gaining trust with the reader and giving them space to form their own judgments. 

People like Jamal and these flag-burning protesters were delusional if they didn’t comprehend that their moral absolutism only resonated with their echo chamber of keyboard warriors and angry rent-a-crowds. […] The world was selfish, ugly, unjust and expensive to live in. Free Palestine, sure, but nothing in this world was for free […] (p.161, p.162)

Discipline depicts such an unbelievably sad state-of-affairs that the prose actually tips into black comedy just to keep itself from jumping off a cliff.  

There was a moment of silence between them, interrupted by Hannah letting out a short, forced laugh in an attempt to diffuse the tension […] Hannah felt as if she might explode and, at the exact same time, she wondered what Peter would make of her thinking about exploding.
(p.33)

What’s uncanny is that Discipline explores censorship and cancel culture and Abdel-Fattah was cancelled from Adelaide Writers Week where she was programmed to speak about Discipline. Judging by the redacted names of people and institutions in the Acknowledgments, Abdel-Fattah repeatedly experiences such censorship. Abdel-Fattah in early 2025, also had her research grant into Arab & Moslem Australian social movements suspended.  

There were people who tried to stop this book from being published. They failed.
(p.245)

Fifteen years of being in this industry and the way it operates still baffles me. It is a tokenistic, racist, hypocritical, unethical system where who you know and what your politics are matters more than the quality of your writing. And when you are given the opportunity to write, you better behave. Through the character of Hannah, Abdel-Fattah captures the frustrations of journalism and how a writer’s words are often re-written without consultation when you are at the bottom of the pecking order. 

[…] why was she such a naïve fool looking for poetic justice in an industry that was driven by a corporate model of subscriptions and advertising? […] She was sandwiched between racism and sexism by people who gave speeches at international Women’s Day breakfasts and pasted Acknowledgements of Country in their email signatures.
(p.21, p.29)

Systems and structures are controlled by white people, and you either sell your soul to cater to their narratives and be rewarded, try to find a way to work within their system but the compensation won’t nearly be as good, or take the gamble and abandon the system all together and who knows how you’re going to survive but at least your soul is intact. The system is designed to pit us against each other, and it takes a tremendous amount of ‘discipline’ just to survive. 

He was exhausted. The academy was like one big chess board […] he would never have the power of checkmate, not in a game that was rigged against him […] he would at least try to make his small corner […] strong (p.196, p.197)

As a Cypriot-Australian writer who has worked in journalism and academia, and who writes fiction and non-fiction; as a writer who has been cancelled unjustly in her career, I don’t agree that this book was published because of the ‘artistic freedom’ Abdel-Fattah believes her publisher University of Queensland possesses (p.246). I am too jaded and have had way too many knives stuck in my back to believe that. Yet, I don’t think I am naïve to believe that Abdel-Fattah wrote her book for people like me. After reading Discipline, I agreed with author Michael Mohammed Ahmad, ‘[…] the very existence of this book provides hope […]’. 

It is relevant to talk about the politics surrounding Discipline because Discipline explores those very dynamics. My perception of Abdel-Fattah before reading Discipline was that she belongs to a politically correct, literary-industry-accepted-and-supported popular clique. Recently, these cliques have come under threat, as powers greater than them yield their own agendas. While I didn’t agree with the government interference regarding Adelaide Writers Festival, at the time I questioned why Abdel-Fattah was complaining when she had been part of campaigns to cancel other writers she didn’t politically align with. 

At times in Discipline I felt Abdel-Fattah was criticising the very behaviours she has engaged in. As I read on, the same question resurfaced: who is allowed to speak? Should I, now, be further vilified and blacklisted if I write an opinion someone doesn’t like, even when I, myself, belong to a marginalised community? Should I be crucified for it? Our world has become fast-paced, judgmental, no time to breathe in social media land

‘[…] if you are a journalist of colour […] and you’re using diluted language, you’re really just a stenographer perpetuating the pro-Israel status quo […] ’ […] She was no stranger to the comments section […] she didn’t feel […] upset […]. She just felt gross (p.186, p.187)

There are times in Discipline where Hannah’s rage spills over, even towards the marginalised.  

Stupid cow, Hannah thought. Fine, keep your head down. I wasn’t expecting anything from you (p.75)

Discipline shows us clearly where the power lies. Gatekeepers don’t need permission to speak, they simply assign permission when they feel comfortable to do so, in their devaluating manner.

Barnaby explained [to Ashraf] that he was fed up with the way institutions used diversity as window dressing instead of valuing the decolonial, alternative knowledge and perspectives of scholars of colour […] ‘You need to find a way to tap into that, prove that our diverse JBU community here is not cynical tokenism but meaningful on its own terms.’ (p.36, p.37), and the rest of us are left to fight it out amongst ourselves.

Family security worries Ashraf: “Were his mother and sister safer now that he was facing a possible misconduct case? Always acting with emotion, never intellect, never diplomacy or reason. It was the miserable fate of Arabs, indeed the Arab and the Muslim world.” (p.221, p.222) with gatekeepers oblivious to their privilege:

Faye had grown us in Yass, for crying out loud. He’d asked her: why Middle Eastern politics? She said she’d […] ‘fallen in love with Arabs’
(p.15) 

Abdel-Fattah had to make us laugh in this book; it was the only way to win us over, to give us hope.

The convention centre was doing an excellent job of burning the planet in order to run the air conditioning at uncomfortably cold levels as they all discussed decolonial approaches to climate change (p.12)

My rage was captured in the character of Hannah, and in the character of Ashraf, who represent opposing ways of operating within systems. I emerged from Discipline teary, to be honest, questioning my black and white thinking. But not in a way that made me feel ashamed, quite the opposite, I felt heard by Abdel-Fattah, which is quite ironic in the context of it all. One can only conclude then that Abdel-Fattah is a skilled writer. I found comfort in this novel. It made me feel less alone as a writer, as a Cypriot in the diaspora fighting for the freedom of my homeland from occupation and colonisation, and as a human fighting for a free Palestine and end to war. 

[…] to my readers. May we remain undisciplined. It is the only hope for this broken world
(p.247). 

I have to be honest, when I was asked to review Discipline, I hesitated. I didn’t think Abdel-Fattah’s writing, based on what I knew about her, would be to my liking. But So, I am shocked to say that I fell in love with Abdel-Fattah’s writing reading Discipline. Any preconceived ideas I had about her have been challenged and shattered. This is despite the hurdle I had to overcome on the Dedication page, which risks alienating readers Abdel-Fattah might otherwise convert through her exquisite prose

I humbly dedicate this book to all the Palestinian academics and journalists killed in Gaza who would be alive if academics and journalists in the west had spoken and acted when they had the chance (p.0). 

Discipline is a highly educational, politically informed book, told through very real characters and real-life situations. It has the potential to shift opinions, create change. It took me time to learn about the politics surrounding Gaza. I am not to blame for the war crimes of others. 

This is where I must raise one of the downfalls of this book. While it does begin strongly, with the characters and their story and trajectory key narrative drivers, a third of the way in the characters start to feel like vehicles for delivering politics, the author’s voice and rage interjecting, with scenes sometimes feeling rushed, without enough build-up. 

It was at these times that I questioned the intended audience. Was Discipline written for a well-educated audience? Or for an audience that wanted to know more? At times I would have preferred the latter, more accessible language, and a little more explanation for those who might not know as much, more character emotional depth, thus bringing the reader closer and widening the reach and impact of the book. I would have liked more in the way of relationship dynamics, especially between Hannah and Jamal. 

But I forgave Abdel-Fattah for this. I have an exceptionally high bar for fiction. It is rare I am hooked from the first page. I read the book quite quickly, another difficult thing to achieve for me. Her words grabbed at my heart very early on and refused to let go, her pain and frustrations became mine, her rage shrilled with mine, even at times when I felt extremely resentful and uncomfortable with the words I was reading, I sat with her, because by that time, she had already won me over. We forgive her transgressions and minor issues because we come to understand that as a Palestinian author, Abdel-Fattah is navigating one of the most difficult political terrains, and she does it eloquently, with class, though nobody’s perfect. 

 

KORALY DIMITRIADIS is Cypriot-Australian writer, performer and poet who creates film and theatre with her poetry. She is the author of Love and Fk Poems (also translated into Greek), Just Give Me The Pills She’s Not Normal, That’s What They Do, and the short story collectionThe Mother Must Die (Puncher and Wattmann). Her poetry films have screened at festivals, have been televised, and won prizes internationally. Yiayia mou (my grandmother) was screened on SBS and at the Sydney Opera House (Red Room Poetry), and was shortlisted for the Woollahra Digital Literary Awards. She was the recipient of a Wheeler Centre Hot Desk Fellowship, and the UNESCO City of Literature residency in Krakow, for her debut fiction manuscript, We Never Said Goodbye. Koraly’s opinion articles and essays have been published widely internationally.

Graeme Miles

Graeme Miles has published three collections of poems: Infernal Topographies (University of Western Australia Press, 2020), Recurrence (John Leonard Press, 2012) and Phosphorescence (Fremantle Press, 2006), as well as many pieces in journals and anthologies. His most recent book was shortlisted in the Tasmanian Literary Awards and his first for the West Australian Premier’s Prize. He has lived in Hobart since 2008 and teaches Latin and ancient Greek literatures at the University of Tasmania. His scholarly work is in ancient Greek literature (especially Greek literature of the Roman era) and philosophy (especially late-antique Platonism).
 
 
House by a still lake
 
in the north of France. We live
here for now, two women
and a child. A place where it’s easy
to shift subtle things – the house
is a concourse for invisible guests.
The son sees them grow vast as a world
in a nutshell of cloudy crystal.
They reach to us as their afterlife,
drawn maybe by the orange leaves
or fantastical reflections on the lake.

And when I let go of this little body
(smaller and softer than trees or mountain)
nothing keeps me anymore in place,
loose of the whole idea of up or down,
loose of the monolithic wardrobe,
glacial bulk of the bed.
                                           Only the lake
gives a still point – around it
a giddying gyre.
                       In the mirror
my familiar face for the last time –
the clay was never fired, stayed free
to be remade by the slowest and cleverest hand.

Angelina Xu

Angelina Xu is a writer, educator and editor based in Naarm. Her work focuses on queer culture, food and contemporary literature but you can find her writing about anything that passes her mind. She has been published in Archer Magazine and The Griffith Review and is currently in the process of launching her substack.
 
 
 
 
Lazy Susan

The giants around the dining table seem vague and unmoved. There’s at least 15 of them and they are all squeezed into bejewelled dresses and tuxedos that are far too tight. The round table is much too big for the party it accommodates leaving each giant effectively alone; their gazes shift slowly and they are constantly leaning towards each other in the vain hope of conversation. In these situations, the private dining room offers a stifling silence and not much else.

I’ve seen this scene in photo albums before: same forced smiles and carefully arranged seating plan.The amber light above casts a curling, Marlboro edge over the table and lends the photos an atavistic sense of intimacy. But being here, now, the photos’ pallidness is sharpened. These photos had surreptitiously convinced me that these giants had not only existed but had somehow lived on. The familiarity of the dining table is unmistakable but everything else was an extended game of self-deception in which I imagined family as both a proper noun and a verb, something that we are and something we do. I had simply confused the real and the live. My mistake.

As it is now, it’s unclear if the giants can see me but I figure it’s best to stay hidden for now. In my panic, I duck under the spout of a pot of tea. It smells like chrysanthemum. With every rotation around the table, I take stock of each giant’s face, all of which seem to demure from their hard-boiled styling. Their features swirl and take shape as if all the presences in this room are being superimposed over each other in successive layers of thick oil paint. I can feel my own face rearrange itself into shapes I cannot recognise, a mouth that doesn’t soften and a single wrinkle nestled vertically between my brows. I don’t really know what’s going on or how I ended up here but it seems that none of the giants do either.

After my third foray around the table, the pleasantries have dwindled and each giant has settled into their seats. One of the giants catches my eye because she is much younger than the others. She has long jet-black hair and a scowl that has already settled deep in her lips. It’s the scowl that ultimately gives her away; she is, or was, my Mother. It dawns on me that her scowl has become my own. I try to console myself with the meek fact that all assessments of likeness between mother and child are somewhat true but almost always superficial. We know from advances in genetic sequencing and social studies that inheritance of certain physical traits or temperaments are inevitable and not necessarily a death sentence. Perhaps, the real truth is that Mother and I negotiated our similarities in a way that made each other readable so that, in living, we could set ourselves apart. In this sense, I didn’t come into my own so much as become actualised by her gaze. That is to say, I didn’t feel seen by her; as she saw me, I became.

The pensive atmosphere is suddenly shattered as the doors burst open. Mother jumps in her seat. Lazy Susan lurches to a violent halt and I’m flung across the table. Still, nobody seems to notice me which I can only take as a moment of karmic relief.

An army of five uptight waiters carrying elaborate dishes proceed in formation. As dishes come crashing down on either side of me – roasted quail and spicy mud crab – Susan shakes beneath my feet. I try desperately to catch a glimpse of the other dishes but can’t see over the dishes beside me. I can only smell the coveted wok hei mingling with what must be delicious fried rice.

The scent is soon eclipsed by the last dish placed on Susan, at the opposite side of this glass expanse, a glossy-eyed barramundi steamed with ginger and spring onions. It looks at me, slick with promise. Traditionally, the eyes are reserved for the most special guest at the dinner table but I’ve been here before so I know that prestige needs to be chased and I must get there first.

As the waiters march out of the room, the giants coo in awe of the dishes in front of them. None of the giants wants to be the first to push Susan. They know that initiating would betray an unseemly eagerness. It becomes increasingly obvious that I must take advantage of this time so I make a start towards the barramundi.

The race is on.

As I sprint past the roasted quail and braised pork, my mouth begins to salivate uncontrollably. My hunger is used to drawing its elbows in and marketing itself as politeness yet now, unsure of whether the giants can see me, my appetite has become feral and the eye is the only thing that will satiate me. The table thrums beneath my feet, loaded and ready, once Susan moves, I will be flung in whichever way she chooses. Whatever follows will have to keep up.

Mother’s face catches the light and does not let go. She is desperate for the barramundi too and it’s only a quarter of a Susan-spin away. She is too young to feel restrained by decorum or shame so I watch on as she stretches her body across the table to reach the fish. The giant beside Mother pushes her back into her seat. What follows is a series of failed attempts that include a sly push of Susan and coercion of the giant on her other side. With every failure, her scowl deepens and I thank God.

This is my chance. I run past Mother and the bright smell of ginger and cooking wine tells me I’m close.

One of the other giants notices Mother’s eagerness and gives Susan a gentle push. She spins in my favour and I am now barrelling towards the barramundi faster than ever. For once, it feels as though the universe is literally spurring me forward. When I finally arrive at the foot of the dish, I let myself take a full breath. My legs are seething in pain but I have won the race.

The eye looks at me
                                                               looking
                                                                                    at it.

I dive feet-first into the iris – a gelatin-thick pool of black. It seeps into my skin as I swim around the hard white pupil. What presents itself to me is a kaleidoscopic vignette of hand-me-down sorrows that all sound like trite what-ifs and had-beens. Is this nostalgia? Is this time curving across the table and making peace?

The eye floats into the air and Mother’s features retract into the flesh of her face like the little feet of an oyster.

I can see all of Susan beneath me as she whirls rapidly and rapidly whirls. For a moment, we can simply
 
wHIrL
                  WhIrl
                                         WhiRl

                                         whirl                                                             whIrl
                                                               Whirl
                                                                                                      WHirl
                                          
                                                                                  WhiRl

                                                                                                      Whirl                                                      WHirl

                                         whirl                                    WHIRL                                                                                     WhirL

                  Whirl
whIRl

The shadows coagulate on the wall in lashings of wanton blue and the dining room begins to crumble and pool like fig-coloured rot. My heart begins to race uncontrollably as the giants adorn their jagged features again. The scent of each dish chases the next one to the outer edges of the room until it all becomes indiscernible except for an oaky soy sauce; it makes me think of ancestry – how deep it is, how rich it is, how much of it is mine to keep.

Mother envelops me in a moist warmth and I plunge down to the bottom of my consciousness. As I fall onto Susan, she groans.

I cast for the eye,

But the eye is gone.

Grace Hu

Grace Hu is Chinese diasporic and based in Sydney. Her poetry has been published in Shot Glass Journal, Cordite Poetry Journal and Rabbit Annual. She short-listed the 2024 Woollahra Digital Literary Award. She co-wrote Chain Play and Serpent Secrets for Slanted Theatre.

 
 
 
Chinoiserie

“It’s Nietzschean slave morality, satisfaction is enough. It meets people’s needs like they’re cattle, without recognition of individual spark and what actually leads to human dignity. But people can tell themselves it’s good enough,” Arlin said. “It’s all capitalist gobbledygook, they won’t fix the problems that are actually killing us.”

“I know what you’re saying, Arlin. But we can’t debate this right now.” 

Arlin stood awkwardly in the doorway and watched as Esther packed the hospital bag. She found herself reminded of how Esther had changed from when she first got to uni. Esther had come to uni with a cookie-cutter personality, she had tried to be more alternative than she was. Arlin had ignored her for months. There was something definite about how Esther did things, as if she had schemas in her head indicating to her how to chop a vegetable neatly, how to greet someone in a hallway or a housemate who’d just woken up, how she wanted to judge a person’s actions. It seemed to Arlin that Esther knew what she was going to think before she even thought it. When she placed things in the bag, the same one they used when Tom’s antibiotics stopped working, it was as if she was confident of exactly where they would land, without straightening or re-arranging. 

The rush of the highway in the distance sounded like the wind. Arlin could just see the church’s window outside, which she always thought looked like a big slice of lotus root, casting shadows into its own hollows in the grey night. 

“It encourages people to stop fighting. They don’t have the will to recover.” 

“And what do you want?” Esther said. “Beck has a bacterial infection. It’s not going to resolve.” 

She didn’t like what happened next. To the people. 

They became too consistently themselves. They were slow to react, as if the thoughts had to twist through the hallways of their congenital minds, but she was slow to react too, had been since she was last ill. They had been playing cards under a fluorescent light strip in Tom’s kitchen. It had been so humid Arlin thought she had stopped sweating. It felt like she was breathing water or breathing through thick rain. Then someone had mentioned as she was itching herself that they had forgotten to turn on the mosquito net and she realised, remembered, these people no longer had such vulnerabilities. She had felt then like she was in a room full of mirrors and the vividness of their eyes only reflected her own humanity back at her. Then she had heard a metal clatter outside the window as something, not the rails, changed on the track. 

She still thought it was that mosquito which got her sick, although she could not be certain. It had been summer and she was bitten a few more times. 

“Are we still going to Beck’s 21st?” she said.

“Yeah of course, he’d kill us if we didn’t and you’re against that.”  

*

“Hey,” he said, “it’s good to see you.” 

Beck looked better, she assumed. They hadn’t been allowed to see him when he was ill. It was meant to make it easier, so when they looked at him they wouldn’t remember how ill he had been, how he looked. Now there was a new shine at the edge of his temple like the dried sweat people had sometimes after a fever. 

She fancied there was a sheen on him also, as if the colour was applied to his skin, not a carefully built up pigment, lighter in some spots, darker in others, almost pointillist. He was dark, but now he looked, she thought, dark but not translucent. But she had seen them in the dark, had shone her phone torch on their hands. They glowed through with light, orange and embryonic, just like people did. 

The air came in humid through the vents. Arlin wondered, not for the first time, if that’s what finally killed him. 

It was how hospitals in China must have been like. Her mum had told her, although not, seemingly, from memory. Even the official signs seemed like a pretence, or a grandiose performance, when the outcomes were so uncertain. 

The walls looked vaguely like they were covered by a very thin layer of yellow grime. The paint was tacky, any touch would leave wet fingerprints. The humidity. 

“You know I’ve always loved you,” she said. 

“You’re a strange one, Arlin. Come sit down!”

Arlin sat down and pulled out the corduroy bear from her tote bag and put it on the hospital sheets, thin and like mountains, under which were Beck’s new legs and his new alien body. 

“Look,” she said. “He’s wearing a bowtie.” 

He went to touch it. His hands were still like hands in pictures, completely steady.

“How did your mum take it?” she said. 

“You know I get your anxiety, my mum’s a neuroscientist.”

“Yeah yeah, your crazy mum.” 

“And she kept us indoors as kids. No sport, no pools, remote learning all the way.”

“Summer cancelled every summer.”

“Yeah, God forbid we interact with the material world and all its varied and dangerous diseases.” 

“Yep, it’s fine as scientific policy but not for her own kids.”

“Yep exactly, not for my kids. Nope!”

“So, how’d she take it?”

“Oh, she got with the program so quick. That scientific consensus in her mind, just changed, just changed like that! But yeah, I know what you mean, Arlin. I wish I got longer in my my body. I feel there’s something missing.”

She felt completely separate from him then. Contemptuous. Their fates had been intertwined but now she realised they had never shared anything that mattered. She was left completely unaffected by what happened to him, and had felt the pain of his death about as much as his new body. Arlin would go on living and Beck would continue to be dead. 

She felt then like she could hate him for bringing her into contact with weakness, but that too would be exhausting. There had been an interplay between them, like harmonic motion between two sets of concentric ripples but now they were the pebbles sinking to the bottom of the pond.

“But the doctors say there’s some function I can recover, so I’m going to work hard at that.” 

“Yeah, you should give it a shot,” she said. 

“It’s okay to accept that things aren’t how you wanted them to be,” he said.  

“Yeah.” 

They were quiet for a moment. Beck was looking straight on at her so that she could see the whites of his eyes with perfect clarity as, she realised, she had never seen them before. 

“You know, I’ve been thinking. I never got to experience much in my body. And what was the point of that? How much faster could I possibly have died if I lived a little. I just feel different about things now, I feel older.” 

He had lost the fight in him, the animal in him. He was almost sedate now. 

“You know, in our group only you and Esther are actually still alive. I want us to stay together and still have those experiences. We’re here for you, even if you don’t feel that way.” 

He was retreating into his memories already, Arlin thought, like he was trying to reach a resolution by replaying who he was, and that was why he desired all of a sudden for them to be happy, and when he spoke he lacked franticness. It was like her and Esther being happy was a path laid out in front of them, he seemed so sure it would happen, or an equation crafted from the Jungian demons of his mind. His desire was entirely divorced from reality, it consisted in himself. He was too consistently himself. A martyr and too reasonable.

And that was how they got you.

As he smiled, the line between his two front teeth was not aligned to the flesh between his nostrils in the middle of his nose. His top teeth were slightly off centre. Had they always been like that, they must have been. Where else could they have gotten that detail. 

“Remember when we were at Margiela and Tom just threw up spontaneously after I told him he’d had enough to drink?”

“I had to throw out a perfectly good pair of Doc Martens after that. Do you remember your boyfriend threw up ON ME? They were leather, they literally don’t make them anymore. ”

“Okay I forgot that part. That was really nice, I really enjoyed it. It was a really good night. We should do it again sometime.”

“Oh my god yeah, definitely,” she said. “I’ve missed you.”

*

“You know,” Esther said, “When I first joined the group I thought Beck hated me.” 

Arlin smiled. “You told me. He’s pretty aloof unless you get to know him.”

“He’s pretty hard to get to know, pretty hard to understand as well. I feel like you’re the only one who understands him, you’re like evil sidekicks looking for a third.” 

“Like Flotsam and Jetsam?”

“What’s Flotsam and Jetsam?” 

“They’re from this kids show.” 

Their apartment, the first place either of them ever had to call their own, smelt like garlic and fried oil from dinner, even in their bedroom. 

The landlord had tried to give it a decadent look. It had glass crystals that hung around the bare living room bulb like a chandelier and that European wallpaper that was meant to look Chinese. Chinoiserie, Beck had said. Arlin didn’t think it looked Chinese at all. It failed to understand how Chinese symmetry worked. The birds, flowers, branches were too evenly spaced, it lacked the subtleness, the sense of movement. 

So close, Arlin could smell the sweet fried leek infusing into Esther’s long straight hair. It looked rough, un-smoothed and shaggy even spread out on their pillows and blankets, coarse and thick like a horse’s mane. 

Outside the highway rushed like the wind. 

Esther was very proud of her hair. It was one of the few things she would own up to being proud of. Even her relentless efficiency was, she claimed, just how things were done properly. She didn’t put it up, even when cooking.

Arlin didn’t trust herself with knives anymore. She’d picked up a tremor when she was ill. 

They heard then the shuddering twinge of their upstairs neighbour wrestling open the bathroom door, and moments later the familiar rush of water and jamming the door closed, and then footsteps the sound of which after a few steps mysteriously went away. 

They lay with a space between them and their heads close together and knees touching, like twins, like sisters. 

The overhead light was dizzyingly bright. When Arlin closed her eyes, it left an imprint that stayed momentarily large, kaleidoscopic. She put her arm over her face and turned in towards Esther. 

“Hey, don’t react badly,” Esther said. 

“Okay.”

“I got my head scanned today.”

“Why would I react badly,” Arlin said. “It’s your choice.”

“I’ve been thinking about Beck. He looks really good. I can’t convince myself that if something were to happen to me, that it would be so bad.” 

“You’d literally be dead.”

“Yeah, but you’ve seen Beck. He has great continuity. If I’m dead, at least I won’t be completely gone.”

Hypothetically, she would have closure. Every unsaid apology, every end of hers would draw to a neat bow in a future she’d never see. Would Esther feel better on her death-bed knowing some version of her would be out there reaching the happiness, the completeness she had desired. And even if she never knew, everyone would recognise that that person was who she had the potential to be. Some version of her would live to experience the excruciating length of life, dark nights of faith and questioning about the world and her own ability that felt as claustrophobic as the night before an execution, to grow old enough to recognise the self-possessed wisdom she had in her youth, to understand things about adulthood Arlin was only now realising she did not understand, how was it that she was still learning such simple things. 

She had been watching adults, who, she found, were all confusing, strange and intensely, singularly themselves, so that they were monstrous and so internal and different from each other, like wells, that it became impossible to imagine them as anything but alone. They grew around their deficiencies, which sometimes grew wider even as they healed. They accumulated more damage and more dysfunction. As the vagueness of young adulthood gave way to the unrelenting precision of maturity, carefully cultivated traits, intensities left in isolation for years, mannerisms developed over years of being the same person. A lifetime of idiosyncrasies. How the same story could change over the years. How a relationship could ebb and flow, draw between understanding and misunderstanding. All things Arlin had only begun to see were things that happened to people. All things Esther could only tell herself Beck would continue to experience.  

“I know you’re really sensitive about things like this.”

“I won’t stay with you after,” Arlin said. “If you die.” 

“Okay, I think I knew that.” 

“You won’t fight as hard to live.”

“You can’t know that.” 

“I’ve seen it.”

“Stop being childish, Arlin. You act like not signing that paper is going to protect you from the things that could kill you, but you’re not any safer.”

She felt in that moment disgusted by Esther, like every little moment, every annoying thing, had been building to this revelation. It was entirely consistent with her character. 

What was it she had done the other day? She was forgetting. How could she forget something that irritated her so much at the time, only the other day. She found it hard to recall examples now, but there had been so many things, they left a feeling, a memory of a feeling that she could recall at will and experience almost impassively.

The outer corners of Esther’s eyelashes had become distinctly curled up, like she had been rubbing her eyes or had lain too hard into the pillow, or like they had been replaced by something that tried to recreate their sense of life, the haphazard way they would sometimes be curled, but without understanding, like chinoiserie.

When she looked at her face, smoothed out and waiting, Arlin wondered if Esther was becoming resigned already. 

“If I died and came back as one of them, I’d fucking kill myself.”

“No,” Esther said. “You’d want to live.”